These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32124315)

  • 1. High-Throughput MHC I Ligand Prediction Using MHCflurry.
    O'Donnell T; Rubinsteyn A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2120():113-127. PubMed ID: 32124315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MHCflurry: Open-Source Class I MHC Binding Affinity Prediction.
    O'Donnell TJ; Rubinsteyn A; Bonsack M; Riemer AB; Laserson U; Hammerbacher J
    Cell Syst; 2018 Jul; 7(1):129-132.e4. PubMed ID: 29960884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MHCflurry 2.0: Improved Pan-Allele Prediction of MHC Class I-Presented Peptides by Incorporating Antigen Processing.
    O'Donnell TJ; Rubinsteyn A; Laserson U
    Cell Syst; 2020 Jul; 11(1):42-48.e7. PubMed ID: 32711842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematically benchmarking peptide-MHC binding predictors: From synthetic to naturally processed epitopes.
    Zhao W; Sher X
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006457. PubMed ID: 30408041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of Uncertainty in Peptide-MHC Binding Prediction Improves High-Affinity Peptide Selection for Therapeutic Design.
    Zeng H; Gifford DK
    Cell Syst; 2019 Aug; 9(2):159-166.e3. PubMed ID: 31176619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NNAlign_MA; MHC Peptidome Deconvolution for Accurate MHC Binding Motif Characterization and Improved T-cell Epitope Predictions.
    Alvarez B; Reynisson B; Barra C; Buus S; Ternette N; Connelley T; Andreatta M; Nielsen M
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2019 Dec; 18(12):2459-2477. PubMed ID: 31578220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benchmarking predictions of MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes in a comprehensively studied model system.
    Paul S; Croft NP; Purcell AW; Tscharke DC; Sette A; Nielsen M; Peters B
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 May; 16(5):e1007757. PubMed ID: 32453790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In silico prediction of peptide-MHC binding affinity using SVRMHC.
    Liu W; Wan J; Meng X; Flower DR; Li T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():283-91. PubMed ID: 18450008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MHCRoBERTa: pan-specific peptide-MHC class I binding prediction through transfer learning with label-agnostic protein sequences.
    Wang F; Wang H; Wang L; Lu H; Qiu S; Zang T; Zhang X; Hu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 May; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 35443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PromPDD, a web-based tool for the prediction, deciphering and design of promiscuous peptides that bind to HLA class I molecules.
    Zhang S; Chen J; Hong P; Li J; Tian Y; Wu Y; Wang S
    J Immunol Methods; 2020 Jan; 476():112685. PubMed ID: 31678214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designing High Binding Affinity Peptides for MHC Class I Using MAM: An In Silico Approach.
    Zhang YW
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2809():263-274. PubMed ID: 38907903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DeepLigand: accurate prediction of MHC class I ligands using peptide embedding.
    Zeng H; Gifford DK
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(14):i278-i283. PubMed ID: 31510651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NetMHCpan-3.0; improved prediction of binding to MHC class I molecules integrating information from multiple receptor and peptide length datasets.
    Nielsen M; Andreatta M
    Genome Med; 2016 Mar; 8(1):33. PubMed ID: 27029192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep convolutional neural networks for pan-specific peptide-MHC class I binding prediction.
    Han Y; Kim D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):585. PubMed ID: 29281985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structural prediction of peptides binding to MHC class I molecules.
    Bui HH; Schiewe AJ; von Grafenstein H; Haworth IS
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 16447245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved peptide-MHC class II interaction prediction through integration of eluted ligand and peptide affinity data.
    Garde C; Ramarathinam SH; Jappe EC; Nielsen M; Kringelum JV; Trolle T; Purcell AW
    Immunogenetics; 2019 Jul; 71(7):445-454. PubMed ID: 31183519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Footprints of antigen processing boost MHC class II natural ligand predictions.
    Barra C; Alvarez B; Paul S; Sette A; Peters B; Andreatta M; Buus S; Nielsen M
    Genome Med; 2018 Nov; 10(1):84. PubMed ID: 30446001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting MHC-peptide binding affinity by differential boundary tree.
    Feng P; Zeng J; Ma J
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 37(Suppl_1):i254-i261. PubMed ID: 34252932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrated modeling of the major events in the MHC class I antigen processing pathway.
    Dönnes P; Kohlbacher O
    Protein Sci; 2005 Aug; 14(8):2132-40. PubMed ID: 15987883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.