225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32124525)
1. Comparison of complications after transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy: a national population-based study.
Berry B; Parry MG; Sujenthiran A; Nossiter J; Cowling TE; Aggarwal A; Cathcart P; Payne H; van der Meulen J; Clarke N
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 32124525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Retrospective Comparison of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsies: Experience of a Single Surgeon.
Young R; Norris B; Reeves F; Peters JS
J Endourol; 2019 Jun; 33(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 30990058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical and financial implications of a decade of prostate biopsies in the NHS: analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics data 2008-2019.
Tamhankar AS; El-Taji O; Vasdev N; Foley C; Popert R; Adshead J
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 32232966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons of cancer detection rate and complications between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy approaches - a single center preliminary study.
Huang GL; Kang CH; Lee WC; Chiang PH
BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31660936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sepsis and 'superbugs': should we favour the transperineal over the transrectal approach for prostate biopsy?
Grummet JP; Weerakoon M; Huang S; Lawrentschuk N; Frydenberg M; Moon DA; O'Reilly M; Murphy D
BJU Int; 2014 Sep; 114(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 24612341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shen PF; Zhu YC; Wei WR; Li YZ; Yang J; Li YT; Li DM; Wang J; Zeng H
Asian J Androl; 2012 Mar; 14(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 22101942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy under intravenous anaesthesia: a clinical, microbiological and cost analysis of 2048 cases over 11 years at a tertiary institution.
Roberts MJ; Macdonald A; Ranasinghe S; Bennett H; Teloken PE; Harris P; Paterson D; Coughlin G; Dunglison N; Esler R; Gardiner RA; Elliott T; Gordon L; Yaxley J
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Mar; 24(1):169-176. PubMed ID: 32759972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
Di Franco CA; Jallous H; Porru D; Giliberto GL; Cebrelli T; Tinelli C; Rovereto B
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Mar; 89(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 28403597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy with omission of antibiotic prophylaxis.
Setia SA; Smith J; Cendo D; Yoder J; Gorin MA; Allaway MJ; Vourganti S
BJU Int; 2022 Jul; 130(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 34491606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transitioning from transrectal to transperineal prostate biopsy using a freehand cognitive approach.
Honoré A; Moen CA; Juliebø-Jones P; Reisaeter LAR; Gravdal K; Chaudhry AA; Rawal R; Sandøy A; Beisland C
BJU Int; 2024 Mar; 133(3):324-331. PubMed ID: 38009392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Local anaesthetic transperineal (LATP) prostate biopsy using a probe-mounted transperineal access system: a multicentre prospective outcome analysis.
Lopez JF; Campbell A; Omer A; Stroman L; Bondad J; Austin T; Reeves T; Phelan C; Leiblich A; Philippou Y; Lovegrove CE; Ranasinha N; Bryant RJ; Leslie T; Hamdy FC; Brewster S; Bell CR; Popert R; Hodgson D; Elsaghir M; Eddy B; Bolomytis S; Persad R; Reddy UD; Foley C; van Rij S; Lam W; Lamb AD
BJU Int; 2021 Sep; 128(3):311-318. PubMed ID: 33448607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing urinary retention after transperineal template biopsy of the prostate: outcomes from a regional cancer centre.
Kum F; Jones A; Nigam R
World J Urol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):337-342. PubMed ID: 29974188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Local Anesthesia: Experience with 1,287 Patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability.
Stefanova V; Buckley R; Flax S; Spevack L; Hajek D; Tunis A; Lai E; Loblaw A;
J Urol; 2019 Jun; 201(6):1121-1126. PubMed ID: 30835607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy.
Miller J; Perumalla C; Heap G
ANZ J Surg; 2005; 75(1-2):48-50. PubMed ID: 15740517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The state of TRUS biopsy sepsis: readmissions to Victorian hospitals with TRUS biopsy-related infection over 5 years.
Roth H; Millar JL; Cheng AC; Byrne A; Evans S; Grummet J
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():49-53. PubMed ID: 26176815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital admissions after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate in men diagnosed with prostate cancer: a database analysis in England.
Anastasiadis E; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
Int J Urol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 25257575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transperineal vs. transrectal biopsy to reduce postinterventional sepsis.
Stangl-Kremser J; Ramaswamy A; Hu JC
Curr Opin Urol; 2023 May; 33(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 36861767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications Following Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Results of the ProBE-PC Randomized Clinical Trial.
Mian BM; Feustel PJ; Aziz A; Kaufman RP; Bernstein A; Avulova S; Fisher HAG
J Urol; 2024 Feb; 211(2):205-213. PubMed ID: 37976319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer.
Kawakami S; Yamamoto S; Numao N; Ishikawa Y; Kihara K; Fukui I
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 17681062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
