121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32124572)
1. Effect of an Interactive Training on Choosing Delivery Method among Primiparous Pregnant Women: An Interventional Study.
Zarifsanaiey N; Bagheri A; Jahanpour F; Nematollahi S; Azodi P
Invest Educ Enferm; 2020 Feb; 38(1):. PubMed ID: 32124572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the efficacy of group counselling using cognitive approach on knowledge, attitude, and decision making of pregnant women about modes of delivery.
Bagherian-Afrakoti N; Alipour A; Pourasghar M; Ahmad Shirvani M
Health Care Women Int; 2018 Jun; 39(6):684-696. PubMed ID: 29388880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of a computerized decision aid on empowering pregnant women for choosing vaginal versus cesarean section delivery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Eslami S; Aslani A; Tara F; Ghalichi L; Erfanian F; Abu-Hanna A
Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():549. PubMed ID: 26634922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.
Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Salient beliefs towards vaginal delivery in pregnant women: A qualitative study from Iran.
Rahnama P; Mohammadi K; Montazeri A
Reprod Health; 2016 Jan; 13():7. PubMed ID: 26801087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran.
Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of "motivational interviewing" and "information, motivation, and behavioral skills" counseling interventions on choosing the mode of delivery in pregnant women: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Shirzad M; Shakibazadeh E; Rahimi Foroushani A; Abedini M; Poursharifi H; Babaei S
Trials; 2020 Nov; 21(1):970. PubMed ID: 33239038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving pregnant women's knowledge on danger signs and birth preparedness practices using an interactive mobile messaging alert system in Dodoma region, Tanzania: a controlled quasi experimental study.
Masoi TJ; Kibusi SM
Reprod Health; 2019 Dec; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 31831076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength in nulliparous women and those with normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section.
Afshari P; Dabagh F; Iravani M; Abedi P
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Aug; 28(8):1171-1175. PubMed ID: 28025685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in low-resource countries: healthcare chain and materno-fetal follow-up].
Koh VM; Essome H; Sama JD; Foumane P; Ebah BM
Pan Afr Med J; 2018; 30():255. PubMed ID: 30637040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of nutrition and reproductive health education of pregnant women in Indonesia using quasi experimental study.
Permatasari TAE; Rizqiya F; Kusumaningati W; Suryaalamsah II; Hermiwahyoeni Z
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Mar; 21(1):180. PubMed ID: 33663418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's knowledge and attitude towards mode of delivery and frequency of cesarean section on mother's request in six public and private hospitals in Tehran, Iran, 2012.
Ghotbi F; Akbari Sene A; Azargashb E; Shiva F; Mohtadi M; Zadehmodares S; Farzaneh F; Yasai FA
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 24689693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The differences between pregnant women who request elective caesarean and those who plan for vaginal birth based on Health Belief Model.
Darsareh F; Aghamolaei T; Rajaei M; Madani A; Zare S
Women Birth; 2016 Dec; 29(6):e126-e132. PubMed ID: 27293112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
Christensen LF; Overgaard C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.
Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors associated with cesarean delivery during labor in primiparous women assisted in the Brazilian Public Health System: data from a National Survey.
Dias MA; Domingues RM; Schilithz AO; Nakamura-Pereira M; do Carmo Leal M
Reprod Health; 2016 Oct; 13(Suppl 3):114. PubMed ID: 27766983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mode of Delivery Preference Among Pregnant Nulliparous Women.
Kjerulff KH; Attanasio LB; Edmonds JK; Repke JT
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2019 Jun; 28(6):874-884. PubMed ID: 30412449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of childbirth on urinary incontinence: a matched cohort study in women aged 40-64 years.
Gyhagen M; Åkervall S; Molin M; Milsom I
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):322.e1-322.e17. PubMed ID: 31121136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Planned vaginal delivery versus planned caesarean section: short-term medical outcome analyzed according to intended mode of delivery.
Larsson C; Saltvedt S; Wiklund I; Andolf E
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Aug; 33(8):796-802. PubMed ID: 21846434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
