These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32126129)

  • 1. A model of crop diversification under labor shocks.
    Beal Cohen AA; Judge J; Muneepeerakul R; Rangarajan A; Guan Z
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229774. PubMed ID: 32126129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.
    Morel K; Revoyron E; San Cristobal M; Baret PV
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229910. PubMed ID: 32163455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactive Web-based Data Visualization and Analysis Tool for Synthetizing on-farm Research Networks Data.
    Laurent A; Lyu X; Kyveryga P; Makowski D; Hofmann H; Miguez F
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 32729218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crop diversity and stability of revenue on farms in Central Europe: An analysis of big data from a comprehensive agricultural census in Bavaria.
    Weigel R; Koellner T; Poppenborg P; Bogner C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207454. PubMed ID: 30452486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relay cropping as a sustainable approach: problems and opportunities for sustainable crop production.
    Tanveer M; Anjum SA; Hussain S; Cerdà A; Ashraf U
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Mar; 24(8):6973-6988. PubMed ID: 28083744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agricultural intensification was associated with crop diversification in India (1947-2014).
    Smith JC; Ghosh A; Hijmans RJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225555. PubMed ID: 31826001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct and indirect impacts of crop-livestock organization on mixed crop-livestock systems sustainability: a model-based study.
    Sneessens I; Veysset P; Benoit M; Lamadon A; Brunschwig G
    Animal; 2016 Nov; 10(11):1911-1922. PubMed ID: 27167725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commercial integrated crop-livestock systems achieve comparable crop yields to specialized production systems: A meta-analysis.
    Peterson CA; Deiss L; Gaudin ACM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231840. PubMed ID: 32379773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chinese project offers a brighter farming future.
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):141. PubMed ID: 29517037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?
    Ryschawy J; Choisis N; Choisis JP; Joannon A; Gibon A
    Animal; 2012 Oct; 6(10):1722-30. PubMed ID: 22717157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maize yield in smallholder agriculture system-An approach integrating socio-economic and crop management factors.
    Dutta S; Chakraborty S; Goswami R; Banerjee H; Majumdar K; Li B; Jat ML
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229100. PubMed ID: 32092077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling crop land use change derived from influencing factors selected and ranked by farmers in North temperate agricultural regions.
    Mehdi B; Lehner B; Ludwig R
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Aug; 631-632():407-420. PubMed ID: 29525718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrated assessment of policy interventions for promoting sustainable irrigation in semi-arid environments: a hydro-economic modeling approach.
    Blanco-Gutiérrez I; Varela-Ortega C; Purkey DR
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():144-60. PubMed ID: 23732193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution.
    Pellegrini P; Fernández RJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(10):2335-2340. PubMed ID: 29463755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mixed crop-livestock farming systems: a sustainable way to produce beef? Commercial farms results, questions and perspectives.
    Veysset P; Lherm M; Bébin D; Roulenc M
    Animal; 2014 Aug; 8(8):1218-28. PubMed ID: 24589421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996-2016.
    Brookes G; Barfoot P
    GM Crops Food; 2018; 9(2):59-89. PubMed ID: 29889608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mobile phone use is associated with higher smallholder agricultural productivity in Tanzania, East Africa.
    Quandt A; Salerno JD; Neff JC; Baird TD; Herrick JE; McCabe JT; Xu E; Hartter J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237337. PubMed ID: 32760125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors impacting producer marketing through community supported agriculture.
    Dong H; Campbell B; Rabinowitz AN
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219498. PubMed ID: 31287848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing pesticide use while preserving crop productivity and profitability on arable farms.
    Lechenet M; Dessaint F; Py G; Makowski D; Munier-Jolain N
    Nat Plants; 2017 Mar; 3():17008. PubMed ID: 28248316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental Nitrogen Losses from Commercial Crop Production Systems in the Suwannee River Basin of Florida.
    Prasad R; Hochmuth GJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167558. PubMed ID: 27907130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.