219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32128607)
1. Effect of dynamic position changes during colonoscope withdrawal: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W
Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1171-1181. PubMed ID: 32128607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Jung P; Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; W Choi C; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG; Hong JB; Kim DJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11253. PubMed ID: 29924056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Dynamic Position Changes on Adenoma Detection During Colonoscope Withdrawal: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.
Lee SW; Chang JH; Ji JS; Maeong IH; Cheung DY; Kim JS; Cho YS; Chung WJ; Lee BI; Kim SW; Kim BW; Choi H; Choi MG
Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 111(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 26526085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple method to improve adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: altering patient position.
Köksal AŞ; Kalkan IH; Torun S; Taşkıran I; Öztaş E; Kayaçetin E; Şaşmaz N
Can J Gastroenterol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):509-12. PubMed ID: 24078934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of the endoscopic device Endocuff™/Endocuff vision™ on quality standards in colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Walls M; Houwen BBSL; Rice S; Seager A; Dekker E; Sharp L; Rees CJ
Colorectal Dis; 2023 Apr; 25(4):573-585. PubMed ID: 36471638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.
Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dynamic position changes on adenoma detection rate during colonoscope withdrawal: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nutalapati V; Desai M; Thoguluva-Chandrasekar VS; Olyaee M; Rastogi A
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Dec; 8(12):E1842-E1849. PubMed ID: 33269319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Jacob A; Schafer A; Yong J; Tonkin D; Rodda D; Eteuati J; Ganesh S; Hewett P
ANZ J Surg; 2019 May; 89(5):E174-E178. PubMed ID: 30896062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrograde inspection
Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of the effect of position changes during colonoscopy withdrawal.
Zhao SB; Wan H; Fu HY; Liu ZX; Wang QS; Ji L; Li ZS; Bai Y
J Dig Dis; 2016 Jun; 17(6):357-65. PubMed ID: 27028973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon.
Boroff ES; Gurudu SR; Hentz JG; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 108(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 23567353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates.
Calderwood AH; Thompson KD; Schroy PC; Lieberman DA; Jacobson BC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):691-699.e1. PubMed ID: 25708756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex.
Vojtechova G; Ngo O; Grega T; Kmochova K; Voska M; Buckova B; Majek O; Zavoral M; Suchanek S
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jul; 29(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 32543806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of second forward-view examination on adenoma detection rate during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Shan K; Lu H; Zhang Z; Xie J; Xu L; Wang W; Hu C; Xu L
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 May; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 33971824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Position change during colonoscope withdrawal increases polyp and adenoma detection in the right but not in the left side of the colon: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Ball AJ; Johal SS; Riley SA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Sep; 82(3):488-94. PubMed ID: 25910661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.
Atia MA; Patel NC; Ratuapli SK; Boroff ES; Crowell MD; Gurudu SR; Faigel DO; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Aug; 82(2):370-375.e1. PubMed ID: 25843614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of hyoscine-N-butylbromide on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled studies.
Rondonotti E; Zolk O; Amato A; Paggi S; Baccarin A; Spinzi G; Radaelli F
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1103-12.e2. PubMed ID: 25053528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
