These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32128776)

  • 1. An Environmental Analysis of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Gowns.
    Vozzola E; Overcash M; Griffing E
    AORN J; 2020 Mar; 111(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 32128776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental considerations in the selection of isolation gowns: A life cycle assessment of reusable and disposable alternatives.
    Vozzola E; Overcash M; Griffing E
    Am J Infect Control; 2018 Aug; 46(8):881-886. PubMed ID: 29655666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. COVID-19 Solutions Are Climate Solutions: Lessons From Reusable Gowns.
    Baker N; Bromley-Dulfano R; Chan J; Gupta A; Herman L; Jain N; Taylor AL; Lu J; Pannu J; Patel L; Prunicki M
    Front Public Health; 2020; 8():590275. PubMed ID: 33330335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of reusable and disposable perioperative textiles: sustainability state-of-the-art 2012.
    Overcash M
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1055-66. PubMed ID: 22492184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical textiles that suit the user: predicting health care workers' preference for disposable versus reusable surgical gowns.
    Brasch J; Rucker M; Haise C
    Health Mark Q; 2013; 30(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 23697855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cleanroom Coveralls.
    Vozzola E; Overcash M; Griffing E
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):236-248. PubMed ID: 29444994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mixed-methods study on end-user perceptions of transitioning to reusable surgical gowns.
    Yap A; Wang K; Chen E; Melhado C; Ahmad T; O'Sullivan P; Gandhi S
    Surg Open Sci; 2023 Jan; 11():33-39. PubMed ID: 36444285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User experience of wearing comfort of reusable versus disposable surgical gowns and environmental perspectives: A cross-sectional survey.
    van Nieuwenhuizen KE; Friedericy HJ; van der Linden S; Jansen FW; van der Eijk AC
    BJOG; 2024 Apr; 131(5):709-715. PubMed ID: 37806784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of laundering on the barrier properties of reusable surgical gown fabrics.
    Leonas KK
    Am J Infect Control; 1998 Oct; 26(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 9795678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of single-use and reusable gowns and drapes in health care.
    Rutala WA; Weber DJ
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 22(4):248-57. PubMed ID: 11379716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: A performance comparison.
    McQuerry M; Easter E; Cao A
    Am J Infect Control; 2021 May; 49(5):563-570. PubMed ID: 33091509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The planetary health effects of COVID-19 in dental care: a life cycle assessment approach.
    Almutairi W; Saget S; Mc Donnell J; Tarnowski A; Johnstone M; Duane B
    Br Dent J; 2022 Aug; 233(4):309-316. PubMed ID: 36028696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the protective value of hospital gowns against blood strike-through and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus penetration.
    Granzow JW; Smith JW; Nichols RL; Waterman RS; Muzik AC
    Am J Infect Control; 1998 Apr; 26(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 9584801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.
    Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing medical waste.
    Conrardy J; Hillanbrand M; Myers S; Nussbaum GF
    AORN J; 2010 Jun; 91(6):711-21. PubMed ID: 20510944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors that influence the effectiveness of surgical gowns in the operating theatre.
    Pissiotis CA; Komborozos V; Papoutsi C; Skrekas G
    Eur J Surg; 1997 Aug; 163(8):597-604. PubMed ID: 9298912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The surgical gowns and drapes of tomorrow. Specifying material performance and test methods.
    Patel SR; Urech D; Werner HP
    Med Device Technol; 1998 Sep; 9(7):50-1. PubMed ID: 10186984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing AORN recommended practices for surgical attire.
    Braswell ML; Spruce L
    AORN J; 2012 Jan; 95(1):122-37; quiz 138-40. PubMed ID: 22201576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Guidelines in Practice: Surgical Attire.
    Link T
    AORN J; 2020 Apr; 111(4):425-439. PubMed ID: 32237137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.