BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32128860)

  • 1. On the relation between the cause-specific hazard and the subdistribution rate for competing risks data: The Fine-Gray model revisited.
    Putter H; Schumacher M; van Houwelingen HC
    Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):790-807. PubMed ID: 32128860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cause-specific cumulative incidence estimation and the fine and gray model under both left truncation and right censoring.
    Geskus RB
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20377575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to simultaneously estimate the absolute risk of different event types: Cumulative total failure probability may exceed 1.
    Austin PC; Steyerberg EW; Putter H
    Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4200-4212. PubMed ID: 33969508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of the Absolute Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Other Events: Issues With the Use of Multiple Fine-Gray Subdistribution Hazard Models.
    Austin PC; Putter H; Lee DS; Steyerberg EW
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2022 Feb; 15(2):e008368. PubMed ID: 35098725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data.
    Austin PC; Fine JP
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4391-4400. PubMed ID: 28913837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of the use of time-varying covariates in the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard competing risk regression model.
    Austin PC; Latouche A; Fine JP
    Stat Med; 2020 Jan; 39(2):103-113. PubMed ID: 31660633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Competing risks regression for stratified data.
    Zhou B; Latouche A; Rocha V; Fine J
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):661-70. PubMed ID: 21155744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard.
    Donoghoe MW; Gebski V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28376736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis and design of randomised clinical trials involving competing risks endpoints.
    Tai BC; Wee J; Machin D
    Trials; 2011 May; 12():127. PubMed ID: 21595883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculations in the presence of competing risks.
    Latouche A; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5370-80. PubMed ID: 17955563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subdistribution hazard models for competing risks in discrete time.
    Berger M; Schmid M; Welchowski T; Schmitz-Valckenberg S; Beyersmann J
    Biostatistics; 2020 Jul; 21(3):449-466. PubMed ID: 30418529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival analysis in the presence of competing risks.
    Zhang Z
    Ann Transl Med; 2017 Feb; 5(3):47. PubMed ID: 28251126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weighted NPMLE for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk.
    Bellach A; Kosorok MR; Rüschendorf L; Fine JP
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2019; 114(525):259-270. PubMed ID: 31073256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Proportional Hazards Regression Model for the Sub-distribution with Covariates Adjusted Censoring Weight for Competing Risks Data.
    He P; Eriksson F; Scheike TH; Zhang MJ
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2016 Mar; 43(1):103-122. PubMed ID: 27034534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semiparametric competing risks regression under interval censoring using the R package intccr.
    Park J; Bakoyannis G; Yiannoutsos CT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 May; 173():167-176. PubMed ID: 31046992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods of competing risks flexible parametric modeling for estimation of the risk of the first disease among HIV infected men.
    Nouri S; Mahmoudi M; Mohammad K; Mansournia MA; Yaseri M; Akhtar-Danesh N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):17. PubMed ID: 31996148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the Cox model to the Fine-Gray model for survival analyses of re-fracture rates.
    Nolan EK; Chen HY
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jun; 15(1):86. PubMed ID: 32519193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation shows undesirable results for competing risks analysis with time-dependent covariates for clinical outcomes.
    Poguntke I; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J; Wolkewitz M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):79. PubMed ID: 30012114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexible competing risks regression modeling and goodness-of-fit.
    Scheike TH; Zhang MJ
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Dec; 14(4):464-83. PubMed ID: 18752067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysing multicentre competing risks data with a mixed proportional hazards model for the subdistribution.
    Katsahian S; Resche-Rigon M; Chevret S; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4267-78. PubMed ID: 16960919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.