218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32128914)
1. Data-Driven Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Using Loss Adaptive Dipole Inversion (LADI).
Kamesh Iyer S; Moon BF; Josselyn N; Ruparel K; Roalf D; Song JW; Guiry S; Ware JB; Kurtz RM; Chawla S; Nabavizadeh SA; Witschey WR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 52(3):823-835. PubMed ID: 32128914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using plug-and-play alternating direction method of multipliers.
Kamesh Iyer S; Moon BF; Josselyn N; Kurtz RM; Song JW; Ware JB; Nabavizadeh SA; Witschey WR
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21679. PubMed ID: 36522372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coherence enhancement in quantitative susceptibility mapping by means of anisotropic weighting in morphology enabled dipole inversion.
Kee Y; Cho J; Deh K; Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Feb; 79(2):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 28556244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative susceptibility mapping across two clinical field strengths: Contrast-to-noise ratio enhancement at 1.5T.
Ippoliti M; Adams LC; Winfried B; Hamm B; Spincemaille P; Wang Y; Makowski MR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1410-1420. PubMed ID: 29659131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge.
Langkammer C; Schweser F; Shmueli K; Kames C; Li X; Guo L; Milovic C; Kim J; Wei H; Bredies K; Buch S; Guo Y; Liu Z; Meineke J; Rauscher A; Marques JP; Bilgic B
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Mar; 79(3):1661-1673. PubMed ID: 28762243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using multi-channel convolutional neural networks with dipole-adaptive multi-frequency inputs.
Si W; Guo Y; Zhang Q; Zhang J; Wang Y; Feng Y
Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1165446. PubMed ID: 37383103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using deep neural network: QSMnet.
Yoon J; Gong E; Chatnuntawech I; Bilgic B; Lee J; Jung W; Ko J; Jung H; Setsompop K; Zaharchuk G; Kim EY; Pauly J; Lee J
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():199-206. PubMed ID: 29894829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-Echo Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping for Strategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) Imaging.
Gharabaghi S; Liu S; Wang Y; Chen Y; Buch S; Jokar M; Wischgoll T; Kashou NH; Zhang C; Wu B; Cheng J; Haacke EM
Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():581474. PubMed ID: 33192267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of quantitative susceptibility mapping methods on evaluating radiation-induced cerebral microbleeds and basal ganglia at 3T and 7T.
Chen Y; Genc O; Poynton CB; Banerjee S; Hess CP; Lupo JM
NMR Biomed; 2022 May; 35(5):e4666. PubMed ID: 35075701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid two-step dipole inversion for susceptibility mapping with sparsity priors.
Kames C; Wiggermann V; Rauscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():276-283. PubMed ID: 29138089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-step calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling.
Chen L; Cai S; van Zijl PCM; Li X
NMR Biomed; 2021 Jul; 34(7):e4517. PubMed ID: 33822416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MEDI+0: Morphology enabled dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Liu Z; Spincemaille P; Yao Y; Zhang Y; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2795-2803. PubMed ID: 29023982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping in a gadolinium phantom using MEDI+0 automatic zero referencing.
Deh K; Kawaji K; Bulk M; Van Der Weerd L; Lind E; Spincemaille P; McCabe Gillen K; Van Auderkerke J; Wang Y; Nguyen TD
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):1229-1236. PubMed ID: 30284727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robust quantitative susceptibility mapping via approximate message passing with parameter estimation.
Huang S; Lah JJ; Allen JW; Qiu D
Magn Reson Med; 2023 Oct; 90(4):1414-1430. PubMed ID: 37249040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiecho complex total field inversion method (mcTFI) for improved signal modeling in quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Wen Y; Spincemaille P; Nguyen T; Cho J; Kovanlikaya I; Anderson J; Wu G; Yang B; Fung M; Li K; Kelley D; Benhamo N; Wang Y
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Oct; 86(4):2165-2178. PubMed ID: 34028868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Streaking artifact suppression of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstructions via L1-norm data fidelity optimization (L1-QSM).
Milovic C; Lambert M; Langkammer C; Bredies K; Irarrazaval P; Tejos C
Magn Reson Med; 2022 Jan; 87(1):457-473. PubMed ID: 34350634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chaos and COSMOS-Considerations on QSM methods with multiple and single orientations and effects from local anisotropy.
Gkotsoulias DG; Jäger C; Müller R; Gräßle T; Olofsson KM; Møller T; Unwin S; Crockford C; Wittig RM; Bilgic B; Möller HE
Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jul; 110():104-111. PubMed ID: 38631534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphology-adaptive total variation for the reconstruction of quantitative susceptibility map from the magnetic resonance imaging phase.
Guo L; Mei Y; Guan J; Tan X; Xu Y; Chen W; Feng Q; Feng Y
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196922. PubMed ID: 29738526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm for quantitative susceptibility mapping in MRI.
Liu T; Xu W; Spincemaille P; Avestimehr AS; Wang Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):816-24. PubMed ID: 22231170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects for fast quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Ngo GC; Bilgic B; Gagoski BA; Sutton BP
Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1645-1658. PubMed ID: 30387905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
