150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32129502)
1. Attentional modulation of unconscious inhibitory visuomotor processes: An EEG study.
Wang Y; Di M; Zhao J; Hu S; Yao Z; Wang Y
Psychophysiology; 2020 Aug; 57(8):e13561. PubMed ID: 32129502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attentional modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm.
Kiefer M; Brendel D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Feb; 18(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 16494680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controlling the unconscious: attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuomotor processes differentially.
Martens U; Ansorge U; Kiefer M
Psychol Sci; 2011 Feb; 22(2):282-91. PubMed ID: 21245492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the influence of near-threshold primes depend on the type of task?
Szumska I; Baran W; Pinkas E; Van der Lubbe RHJ
Conscious Cogn; 2019 Nov; 76():102827. PubMed ID: 31622883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mask- and distractor-triggered inhibitory processes in the priming of motor responses: an EEG study.
Jaśkowski P; Białuńska A; Tomanek M; Verleger R
Psychophysiology; 2008 Jan; 45(1):70-85. PubMed ID: 17887961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The availability of attentional resources modulates the inhibitory strength related to weakly activated priming.
Wang Y; Wang Y; Liu P; Dai D; Di M; Chen Q
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1655-64. PubMed ID: 27198916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mask stimulus triggers inhibition in subliminal visuomotor priming.
Boy F; Clarke K; Sumner P
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 190(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 18682922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional capture by context cues, not inhibition of cue singletons, explains same location costs.
Schönhammer JG; Becker SI; Kerzel D
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Jun; 46(6):610-628. PubMed ID: 32191113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Masked stimuli modulate endogenous shifts of spatial attention.
Palmer S; Mattler U
Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):486-503. PubMed ID: 23528730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues.
Janczyk M; Reuss H
Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of the global/local probability effect on the neural processing of cues and targets. A functional systems approach.
Arjona A; Rodríguez E; Morales M; Gómez CM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():52-61. PubMed ID: 30342061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cue validity probability influences neural processing of targets.
Arjona A; Escudero M; Gómez CM
Biol Psychol; 2016 Sep; 119():171-83. PubMed ID: 27430935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials.
Vath N; Schmidt T
Neuroscience; 2007 Mar; 145(1):197-208. PubMed ID: 17258867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporal ambiguity of onsets in a cueing task prevents facilitation but not inhibition of return.
Malevich T; Ardasheva L; Krüger HM; MacInnes WJ
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):106-117. PubMed ID: 29075992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential P3 effects in a Posner's spatial cueing paradigm: trial-by-trial learning of the predictive value of the cue.
Gómez CM; Flores A; Digiacomo MR; Vázquez-Marrufo M
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2009; 69(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 19593330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissociating temporal attention from spatial attention and motor response preparation: A high-density EEG study.
Faugeras F; Naccache L
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):947-957. PubMed ID: 26433120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional modulation of masked semantic priming by visible and masked task cues.
Kiefer M; Trumpp NM; Schaitz C; Reuss H; Kunde W
Cognition; 2019 Jun; 187():62-77. PubMed ID: 30836302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An electrophysiological study of response conflict processing across the lifespan: assessing the roles of conflict monitoring, cue utilization, response anticipation, and response suppression.
Hämmerer D; Li SC; Müller V; Lindenberger U
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3305-16. PubMed ID: 20638396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reexamining unconscious response priming: A liminal-prime paradigm.
Avneon M; Lamy D
Conscious Cogn; 2018 Mar; 59():87-103. PubMed ID: 29329968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
