196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32130059)
1. 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Test Results in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS) Cohort.
Lin DW; Zheng Y; McKenney JK; Brown MD; Lu R; Crager M; Boyer H; Tretiakova M; Brooks JD; Dash A; Fabrizio MD; Gleave ME; Kolb S; Liss M; Morgan TM; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Tsiatis A; Pingitore A; Nelson PS; Newcomb LF
J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 38(14):1549-1557. PubMed ID: 32130059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score Predicts Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy and Adverse Surgical Pathology in a Racially Diverse Population of Men with Clinically Low- and Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Cullen J; Rosner IL; Brand TC; Zhang N; Tsiatis AC; Moncur J; Ali A; Chen Y; Knezevic D; Maddala T; Lawrence HJ; Febbo PG; Srivastava S; Sesterhenn IA; McLeod DG
Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):123-31. PubMed ID: 25465337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Biopsy-based 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Metastases and Prostate Cancer Death in Surgically Treated Men with Clinically Localized Disease.
Van Den Eeden SK; Lu R; Zhang N; Quesenberry CP; Shan J; Han JS; Tsiatis AC; Leimpeter AD; Lawrence HJ; Febbo PG; Presti JC
Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):129-138. PubMed ID: 28988753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unified model involving genomics, magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density outperforms individual co-variables at predicting biopsy upgrading in patients on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.
Beksac AT; Ratnani P; Dovey Z; Parekh S; Falagario U; Roshandel R; Sobotka S; Kewlani D; Davis A; Weil R; Bashorun H; Jambor I; Lewis S; Haines K; Tewari AK
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Mar; 5(3):e1492. PubMed ID: 34931468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score as a Predictor of Adverse Pathology in Men on Active Surveillance.
Kornberg Z; Cooperberg MR; Cowan JE; Chan JM; Shinohara K; Simko JP; Tenggara I; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):702-709. PubMed ID: 31026214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 17-Gene Panel Genomic Prostate Score Has Similar Predictive Accuracy for Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in African American and European American Men.
Murphy AB; Carbunaru S; Nettey OS; Gornbein C; Dixon MA; Macias V; Sharifi R; Kittles RA; Yang X; Kajdacsy-Balla A; Gann P
Urology; 2020 Aug; 142():166-173. PubMed ID: 32277993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association Between Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score and Adverse Tumor Pathology After Radical Prostatectomy.
Covas Moschovas M; Chew C; Bhat S; Sandri M; Rogers T; Dell'Oglio P; Roof S; Reddy S; Sighinolfi MC; Rocco B; Patel V
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Mar; 8(2):418-424. PubMed ID: 33757735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI-Based Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Predicts Gleason Score Upgrade in an Active Surveillance Cohort.
Washington SL; Baskin AS; Ameli N; Nguyen HG; Westphalen AC; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):574-578. PubMed ID: 31913068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of a 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score in Serial Testing of Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Cedars BE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Tenggara I; Chan JM; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 30958742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.
Klein EA; Cooperberg MR; Magi-Galluzzi C; Simko JP; Falzarano SM; Maddala T; Chan JM; Li J; Cowan JE; Tsiatis AC; Cherbavaz DB; Pelham RJ; Tenggara-Hunter I; Baehner FL; Knezevic D; Febbo PG; Shak S; Kattan MW; Lee M; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 24836057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Impact of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy on Recurrence Outcomes After Initial Active Surveillance: Results from a Large Institutional Cohort.
Shee K; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Shinohara K; Nguyen HG; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38057193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A 17-gene Panel for Prediction of Adverse Prostate Cancer Pathologic Features: Prospective Clinical Validation and Utility.
Eggener S; Karsh LI; Richardson T; Shindel AW; Lu R; Rosenberg S; Goldfischer E; Korman H; Bennett J; Newmark J; Denes BS
Urology; 2019 Apr; 126():76-82. PubMed ID: 30611659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic Prostate Score, PI-RADS™ version 2 and Progression in Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Kornberg Z; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Cooperberg MR; Chan JM; Zhao S; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):300-307. PubMed ID: 30179620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Immediate versus delayed radical prostatectomy: updated outcomes following active surveillance of prostate cancer.
Filippou P; Welty CJ; Cowan JE; Perez N; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):458-63. PubMed ID: 26138041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score assay as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in men with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer.
Helfand BT; Paterakos M; Wang CH; Talaty P; Abran J; Bennett J; Hall DW; Lehman A; Aboushwareb T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0273782. PubMed ID: 36048818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Natural History of Untreated Biopsy Grade Group Progression and Delayed Definitive Treatment for Men on Active Surveillance for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.
Chappidi MR; Bell A; Cowan JE; Greenberg SA; Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2022 May; 207(5):1001-1009. PubMed ID: 34981949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tailoring Intensity of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Individualized Prediction of Risk Stability.
Cooperberg MR; Zheng Y; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Zhu K; Cowan JE; Brooks JD; Dash A; Gleave ME; Martin F; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Carroll PR; Lin DW
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):e203187. PubMed ID: 32852532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
