64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32130214)
1. Tolerance to ambiguous uncertainty predicts prosocial behavior.
Vives ML; FeldmanHall O
Nat Commun; 2018 Jun; 9(1):2156. PubMed ID: 29895948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding clinical and non-clinical decisions under uncertainty: a scenario-based survey.
; Simianu VV; Grounds MA; Joslyn SL; LeClerc JE; Ehlers AP; Agrawal N; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Flaxman AD; Flum DR
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Dec; 16(1):153. PubMed ID: 27905926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk preferences and aging: the "certainty effect" in older adults' decision making.
Mather M; Mazar N; Gorlick MA; Lighthall NR; Burgeno J; Schoeke A; Ariely D
Psychol Aging; 2012 Dec; 27(4):801-16. PubMed ID: 23066800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The parietal cortex has a causal role in ambiguity computations in humans.
Valdebenito-Oyarzo G; Martínez-Molina MP; Soto-Icaza P; Zamorano F; Figueroa-Vargas A; Larraín-Valenzuela J; Stecher X; Salinas C; Bastin J; Valero-Cabré A; Polania R; Billeke P
PLoS Biol; 2024 Jan; 22(1):e3002452. PubMed ID: 38198502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Problematic social media use is associated with the evaluation of both risk and ambiguity during decision making.
Meshi D; Freestone D; Özdem-Mertens C
J Behav Addict; 2021 Jul; 10(3):779-787. PubMed ID: 34329191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration of social cues and individual experiences during instrumental avoidance learning.
Pärnamets P; Olsson A
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Sep; 16(9):e1008163. PubMed ID: 32898146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic Decisions with Ambiguous Outcome Magnitudes Vary with Low and High Stakes but Not Trait Anxiety or Depression.
Zbozinek TD; Charpentier CJ; Qi S; Mobbs D
Comput Psychiatr; 2021; 5(1):119-139. PubMed ID: 38773996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in Risk Aversion between Young and Older Adults.
Albert SM; Duffy J
Neurosci Neuroecon; 2012 Jan; 2012(1):. PubMed ID: 24319671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice.
Dickhaut J; McCabe K; Nagode JC; Rustichini A; Smith K; Pardo JV
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Mar; 100(6):3536-41. PubMed ID: 12626760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Much Are Borrowers Willing to Pay to Remove Uncertainty Surrounding Mortgage Defaults?
Anderson JT; Gibson S; Luchtenberg KF; Seiler MJ
J Real Estate Financ Econ (Dordr); 2022; 64(4):500-522. PubMed ID: 38624780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Higher-order risk preferences in social settings.
Heinrich T; Mayrhofer T
Exp Econ; 2018; 21(2):434-456. PubMed ID: 29720890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome context-dependence is not WEIRD: Comparing reinforcement- and description-based economic preferences worldwide.
Anlló H; Bavard S; Benmarrakchi F; Bonagura D; Cerrotti F; Cicue M; Gueguen M; Guzmán EJ; Kadieva D; Kobayashi M; Lukumon G; Sartorio M; Yang J; Zinchenko O; Bahrami B; Concha JS; Hertz U; Konova AB; Li J; O'Madagain C; Navajas J; Reyes G; Sarabi-Jamab A; Shestakova A; Sukumaran B; Watanabe K; Palminteri S
Res Sq; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 36909645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.
Dennison JB; Sazhin D; Smith DV
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2022 May; 13(3):e1589. PubMed ID: 35137549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Neuroeconomics Approach to Obesity.
Dan O; Wertheimer EK; Levy I
Biol Psychiatry; 2022 May; 91(10):860-868. PubMed ID: 34861975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion.
Jia R; Furlong E; Gao S; Santos LR; Levy I
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0228782. PubMed ID: 32130214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.
Li R; Roberts RC; Huettel SA; Brannon EM
J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jul; 159():319-326. PubMed ID: 28359540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.
FeldmanHall O; Glimcher P; Baker AL; Phelps EA
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27690508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making?
Osmont A; Cassotti M; Agogué M; Houdé O; Moutier S
Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Apr; 22(2):572-7. PubMed ID: 25030206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision-making under uncertainty: biases and Bayesians.
Trimmer PC; Houston AI; Marshall JA; Mendl MT; Paul ES; McNamara JM
Anim Cogn; 2011 Jul; 14(4):465-76. PubMed ID: 21360119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
