These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors. Alberti PW; Riko K Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Noise induced hearing loss among male airport workers in Korea. Hong OS; Chen SP; Conrad KM AAOHN J; 1998 Feb; 46(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 9526275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hearing conservation in industry. Swan S; Daniell W Occup Health Saf; 2002 Jun; 71(6):78-80. PubMed ID: 12068525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The noise exposed factory workers: the prevalence of sensori-neural hearing loss and their use of personal hearing protection devices. Maisarah SZ; Said H Med J Malaysia; 1993 Sep; 48(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 8183139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Test of the Health Promotion Model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection. Lusk SL; Ronis DL; Kerr MJ; Atwood JR Nurs Res; 1994; 43(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 8183656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Recognition, evaluation, and control. Stearns M Occup Health Saf; 2000 Jun; 69(6):97-100. PubMed ID: 10868381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [The noise damage situation on ship yards]. Kleinfeldt D; Kretschmer B; Dahl D Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1979 Mar; 73(6):301-3. PubMed ID: 463104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Improving hearing conservation in the industrial workplace setting. Sataloff J; Sataloff RT Occup Health Saf; 1987 Mar; 56(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 3561909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Integrated long-term measurements in noise and vibration measurement technics]. Weiszing H Z Gesamte Hyg; 1986 Apr; 32(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 3727639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Noise-induced hearing loss: the family physician's role. Dobie RA Am Fam Physician; 1987 Dec; 36(6):141-8. PubMed ID: 3687673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing conservation in mining. McBride DI Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Aug; 54(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 15289584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effectiveness of computer-based tailoring versus targeting to promote use of hearing protection. Kerr MJ; Savik K; Monsen KA; Lusk SL Can J Nurs Res; 2007 Mar; 39(1):80-97. PubMed ID: 17450706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Engineering measures can muffle hazards heard in noisy work areas. Rekus JF Occup Health Saf; 1993 Sep; 62(9):82-9. PubMed ID: 8414376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Tactics against workplace hearing loss motivate employees to wear protection. DeJoy DM Occup Health Saf; 1994 Mar; 63(3):50-4. PubMed ID: 9156458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective, randomized controlled assessment of the short- and long-term efficacy of a hearing conservation education program in Canadian elementary school children. Neufeld A; Westerberg BD; Nabi S; Bryce G; Bureau Y Laryngoscope; 2011 Jan; 121(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 21120832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bad assumptions about hearing protection. Witt B Occup Health Saf; 2008 Sep; 77(9):56, 58, 60. PubMed ID: 18807835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Effectiveness of individual means of protection in groups exposed to aircraft noise]. Marullo T; Mazza G Riv Med Aeronaut Spaz; 1970; 33(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 5538512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. No more guesswork. At last, hearing protectors can be fit tested! Seidemann M Occup Health Saf; 2001 Sep; 70(9):130-2. PubMed ID: 11582685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]