These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32132629)

  • 1. Disentangling sensorimotor and cognitive cardioafferent effects: A cardiac-cycle-time study on spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Larra MF; Finke JB; Wascher E; Schächinger H
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4059. PubMed ID: 32132629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain-behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):321-31. PubMed ID: 8836228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.
    Couth S; Gowen E; Poliakoff E
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):855-64. PubMed ID: 24337351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial S-R compatibility: positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction.
    Heister G; Schroeder-Heister P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1994 Feb; 85(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 8165921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space.
    Bächtold D; Baumüller M; Brugger P
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Aug; 36(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 9751438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigation of stimulus-response compatibility using a startling acoustic stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Feb; 78(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22099151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of SNARC compatibility on perceptual accuracy: evidence from object substitution masking.
    Huffman G; Pratt J
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jul; 80(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 26067890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location.
    Valle-Inclán F; Sohn F; Redondo M
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 17971057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object affordance and spatial-compatibility effects in Parkinson's disease.
    Galpin A; Tipper SP; Dick JP; Poliakoff E
    Cortex; 2011 Mar; 47(3):332-41. PubMed ID: 20189167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).
    Braun CM; Larocque C; Achim A
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(4):442-56. PubMed ID: 15292975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric sensitivity to body stimuli in simple reaction time.
    Aziz-Zadeh L; Iacoboni M; Zaidel E
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 170(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difference in stimulus-response compatibility effect in premotor and motor time between upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 1):939-46. PubMed ID: 9885062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of stimulus-response compatibility on cortical motor activation.
    Dassonville P; Lewis SM; Zhu XH; Ugurbil K; Kim SG; Ashe J
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jan; 13(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11133304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of face and inanimate-object contexts on stimulus-response compatibility.
    Pick DF; Specker S; Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 24065284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli.
    Berlucchi G; Crea F; Di Stefano M; Tassinari G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1977 Aug; 3(3):505-17. PubMed ID: 886281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanisms underlying flexible adaptation of cognitive control: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence in a flanker task.
    Zurawska Vel Grajewska B; Sim EJ; Hoenig K; Herrnberger B; Kiefer M
    Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 1421():52-65. PubMed ID: 21981803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Triggered by your heart: Effects of cardioafferent traffic and stress on automatic responses in a Simon task.
    von Haugwitz L; Wascher E; Larra MF
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Aug; 61(8):e14572. PubMed ID: 38520130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.