These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32132629)

  • 21. A choice reaction-time task in the rat: a new model using air-puff stimuli and lever-release responses.
    Kaneko H; Tamura H; Kawashima T; Suzuki SS
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 174(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 16934882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bimodal (auditory and visual) left frontoparietal circuitry for sensorimotor integration and sensorimotor learning.
    Iacoboni M; Woods RP; Mazziotta JC
    Brain; 1998 Nov; 121 ( Pt 11)():2135-43. PubMed ID: 9827773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
    Friedgen E; Koch I; Stephan DN
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Oct; 50(7):1546-1562. PubMed ID: 35103924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(4):276-84. PubMed ID: 26421450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stimulus-response compatibility and response preparation: effects on motor component of information processing for upper and lower limb responses.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T; Asami T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 16491672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Control-display alignment determines the prevalent compatibility effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response tasks.
    Lee S; Miles JD; Vu KP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 26169949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reversed effect of spatial compatibility when taking avatar's perspective.
    Müsseler J; Ruhland L; Böffel C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1539-1549. PubMed ID: 30134768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Affordance Compatibility Effect for Word Learning in Virtual Reality.
    Gordon CL; Shea TM; Noelle DC; Balasubramaniam R
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jun; 43(6):e12742. PubMed ID: 31204801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Pick DF
    Psychol Res; 2000; 64(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 11109865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Apr; 57(3):539-56. PubMed ID: 15204140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamics of sensorimotor cortex activation to spatial sounds precueing ipsi- versus contralateral manual responses.
    Kaiser J; Ulrich R; Lutzenberger W
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Oct; 17(3):573-83. PubMed ID: 14561446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of anatomical factors and spatial compatibility on the stimulus-response relationship in the absence of the corpus callosum.
    Di Stefano M; Sauerwein HC; Lassonde M
    Neuropsychologia; 1992 Feb; 30(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 1560895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex differentially modulates perception and sensorimotor transformations.
    Meehan SK; Legon W; Staines WR
    Neuroscience; 2008 Nov; 157(2):424-31. PubMed ID: 18838111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response-effect compatibility.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2011 May; 75(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 20625765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Are automatic imitation and spatial compatibility mediated by different processes?
    Cooper RP; Catmur C; Heyes C
    Cogn Sci; 2013; 37(4):605-30. PubMed ID: 22578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Emerging features of modality mappings in task switching: modality compatibility requires variability at the level of both stimulus and response modality.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28578525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parametric exploration of the Simon effect across visual space.
    Klein RM; Dove ME; Ivanoff J; Eskes GA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2006 Jun; 60(2):112-26. PubMed ID: 17133887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Time-varying cortical activations related to visual-tactile cross-modal links in spatial selective attention.
    Kida T; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3585-96. PubMed ID: 17360823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.