These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32132629)

  • 41. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E; McIlroy WE; Green R; Verrier MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15599726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects.
    Janczyk M; Xiong A; Proctor RW
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1297-1314. PubMed ID: 30844314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of stimulus pair orientation and hand switching on reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transfer.
    Leblanc-Sirois Y; Braun CMJ; Elie-Fortier J
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1593-1602. PubMed ID: 29582107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Separating mental transformations and spatial compatibility effects in the own body transformation task.
    May M; Wendt M
    Cogn Process; 2012 Aug; 13 Suppl 1():S257-60. PubMed ID: 22806652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Spatially precise bilateral arm movements are controlled by the contralateral hemisphere: evidence from a lateralized visual stimulus paradigm.
    Garry MI; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 11807583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm.
    Masaki H; Takasawa N; Yamazaki K
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jul; 37(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 10934905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects.
    Galashan D; Wittfoth M; Fehr T; Herrmann M
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A Direct Comparison of Spatial Attention and Stimulus-Response Compatibility between Mice and Humans.
    Schnabel UH; Van der Bijl T; Roelfsema PR; Lorteije JAM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 33(5):771-783. PubMed ID: 34449840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of response eccentricity and relative position on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility with joystick and keypress responses.
    Proctor RW; Cho YS
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Feb; 56(2):309-27. PubMed ID: 12613566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Valence-space compatibility effects depend on situated motor fluency in both right- and left-handers.
    Milhau A; Brouillet T; Brouillet D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):887-99. PubMed ID: 25379954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Automatic and imperative motor activations in stimulus-response compatibility: magnetoencephalographic analysis of upper and lower limbs.
    Kato Y; Endo H; Kizuka T; Asami T
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):51-61. PubMed ID: 16078021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Neuronal correlates of sensorimotor association in stimulus-response compatibility.
    Riehle A; Kornblum S; Requin J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1708-26. PubMed ID: 9425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cardiac modulation of startle: effects on eye blink and higher cognitive processing.
    Schulz A; Reichert CF; Richter S; Lass-Hennemann J; Blumenthal TD; Schächinger H
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19720438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Mishler S; Proctor RW
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Aug; 32(5):1003-1017. PubMed ID: 28946804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Correlations between spatial compatibility effects: are arrows more like locations or words?
    Miles JD; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2012 Nov; 76(6):777-91. PubMed ID: 21909980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: evidence for spatial coding.
    Weeks DJ; Proctor RW; Beyak B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 May; 48(2):367-83. PubMed ID: 7610272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of stimulus-response compatibility in mediating expert performance in baseball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():179-88. PubMed ID: 18048011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Event-related beta desynchronization indicates timing of response selection in a delayed-response paradigm in humans.
    Kaiser J; Birbaumer N; Lutzenberger W
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Oct; 312(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 11602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.