These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32132721)
21. SfN Journals: Two Paths, One Goal: Sharing Strong Science. Bernard C; Picciotto M eNeuro; 2016; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 27419219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. AJIC's peer review process: striving for ever-increasing excellence. Bunner C; Larson EL Am J Infect Control; 2013 Feb; 41(2):96. PubMed ID: 23369313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of peer review in FPM. Backer LA Fam Pract Manag; 2012; 19(6):4. PubMed ID: 23317119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary. Allen LA; Ho PM Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The art and science of scientific writing. Mestres CA; Sampathkumar A Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2019 Jun; 27(5):335-337. PubMed ID: 31188675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Producing a scientific journal in a small scientific community: an author-helpful policy. Marusic M; Misak A; Kljakovic-Gaspic M; Fister K; Hren D; Marusic A Int Microbiol; 2004 Jun; 7(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 15248164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Our editorial process--some experiences and reflections. Emmelin M; Wall S Scand J Public Health; 2003; 31(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 12850969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Reducing the costs of peer review. Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider. Kulstad E PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. IJP open--one year later. Patterson A Int J Psychoanal; 2015 Feb; 96(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 25808328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Editorial misconduct. Smith R BMJ; 2003 Jun; 326(7401):1224-5. PubMed ID: 12791712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Preprints and Cardiovascular Science: Prescient or Premature? Nallamothu BK; Hill JA Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 28912199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality? GarcĂa-Doval I PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The gauntlet of peer review. Toomasian JM Perfusion; 2013 Sep; 28(5):376. PubMed ID: 23963954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]