These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32134317)

  • 1. Know your weaknesses: Sophisticated impulsiveness motivates voluntary self-restrictions.
    Soutschek A; Tobler PN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1611-1623. PubMed ID: 32134317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Binding oneself to the mast: stimulating frontopolar cortex enhances precommitment.
    Soutschek A; Ugazio G; Crockett MJ; Ruff CC; Kalenscher T; Tobler PN
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Apr; 12(4):635-642. PubMed ID: 28170049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reinforcement learning model of precommitment in decision making.
    Kurth-Nelson Z; Redish AD
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2010; 4():184. PubMed ID: 21179584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conquering the inner couch potato: precommitment is an effective strategy to enhance motivation for effortful actions.
    Studer B; Koch C; Knecht S; Kalenscher T
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 374(1766):20180131. PubMed ID: 30966912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the Frontopolar Cortex (FPC) Alters the Demand for Precommitment.
    Wang J; Li Y; Wang S; Guo W; Ye H; Shi J; Luo J
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Sep; 414():113487. PubMed ID: 34302873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of precommitment on risk-taking while gambling: A preliminary study.
    Brevers D; Noel X; Clark L; Zyuzin J; Justin Park J; Bechara A
    J Behav Addict; 2016 Mar; 5(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 28092193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interventions aimed at changing impulsive choice in rats: Effects of immediate and relatively long delay to reward training.
    Fox AE; Visser EJ; Nicholson AM
    Behav Processes; 2019 Jan; 158():126-136. PubMed ID: 30468886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restricting temptations: neural mechanisms of precommitment.
    Crockett MJ; Braams BR; Clark L; Tobler PN; Robbins TW; Kalenscher T
    Neuron; 2013 Jul; 79(2):391-401. PubMed ID: 23889938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognitive deficits are associated with lower sensitivity to preference reversals in nicotine dependence.
    Soutschek A; Bulley A; Wittekind CE
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19787. PubMed ID: 36396945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nucleus accumbens core lesions induce sub-optimal choice and reduce sensitivity to magnitude and delay in impulsive choice tasks.
    Steele CC; Peterson JR; Marshall AT; Stuebing SL; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 339():28-38. PubMed ID: 29146281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoiding the conflict: Metacognitive awareness drives the selection of low-demand contexts.
    Desender K; Buc Calderon C; Van Opstal F; Van den Bussche E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1397-1410. PubMed ID: 28368164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. I can't wait! Neural reward signals in impulsive individuals exaggerate the difference between immediate and future rewards.
    Schmidt B; Holroyd CB; Debener S; Hewig J
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Mar; 54(3):409-415. PubMed ID: 27859316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Theories of intelligence influence self-regulated study choices and learning.
    Peng Y; Tullis JG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):487-496. PubMed ID: 31282727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mapping self-reported to behavioral impulsiveness: the role of task parameters.
    Lange F; Eggert F
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 25346353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A time-based intervention to treat impulsivity in male and female rats.
    Panfil K; Bailey C; Davis I; Mains A; Kirkpatrick K
    Behav Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 379():112316. PubMed ID: 31655096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.
    Xu P; González-Vallejo C; Vincent BT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Dec; 149(12):2289-2313. PubMed ID: 32391703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Rung JM; Madden GJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1349-1381. PubMed ID: 30148386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impulsive choice and pre-exposure to delays: III. Four-month test-retest outcomes in male wistar rats.
    Renda CR; Madden GJ
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():108-12. PubMed ID: 27016155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of basolateral amygdala dopamine D2 receptors in impulsive choice in acute cocaine-treated rats.
    Li Y; Zuo Y; Yu P; Ping X; Cui C
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():187-95. PubMed ID: 25823760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demand characteristics in episodic future thinking II: The role of cues and cue content in changing delay discounting.
    Rung JM; Madden GJ
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2019 Oct; 27(5):482-495. PubMed ID: 30762382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.