212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32134897)
1. Mandibular incisive canal-related prevalence, morphometric parameters, and implant placement implications: a multicenter study of 847 CBCT scans.
Barbosa DA; Kurita LM; Pimenta AV; Teixeira RC; Silva PG; Ribeiro TR; Melo DP; Costa FW
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 May; 25(3):e337-e345. PubMed ID: 32134897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mandibular incisive canal by cone beam CT].
Huang H; Liu P; Li X; Pei Z; Yang X; Bai S; Huang Y
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 31(5):479-82. PubMed ID: 24298798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The prevalence of mandibular incisive nerve canal and to evaluate its average location and dimension in Indian population.
Ramesh AS; Rijesh K; Sharma A; Prakash R; Kumar A; Karthik
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2015 Aug; 7(Suppl 2):S594-6. PubMed ID: 26538925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
Pires CA; Bissada NF; Becker JJ; Kanawati A; Landers MA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The mandibular incisive canal and its anatomical relationships: A cone beam computed tomography study.
Pereira-Maciel P; Tavares-de-Sousa E; Oliveira-Sales MA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2015 Nov; 20(6):e723-8. PubMed ID: 26449433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular incisive canal in Han Chinese using cone beam computed tomography.
Kong N; Hui M; Miao F; Yuan H; Du Y; Chen N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1142-6. PubMed ID: 27184354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence and Morphology of Mandibular Incisive Canal: Comparison among Healthy, Periodontitis and Edentulous Mandibles in a Population of the Beijing Area Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Zhang YQ; Yan XB; Zhang LQ; Xie XY; Liu DG; Zhang ZY
Chin J Dent Res; 2019; 22(4):241-249. PubMed ID: 31859284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphometric Analysis of the Midline Mandibular Lingual Canal and Mandibular Lingual Foramina: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Evaluation.
Alqutaibi AY; Alassaf MS; Elsayed SA; Alharbi AS; Habeeb AT; Alqurashi MA; Albulushi KA; Elboraey MO; Alsultan K; Mahmoud II
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Location and Anatomical Characteristics of Mental Foramen, Anterior Loop and Mandibular Incisive Canal Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Panjnoush M; Rabiee ZS; Kheirandish Y
J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Mar; 13(2):126-132. PubMed ID: 27928241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of anterior mandibular anatomy by using cone beam computed tomography: A study of 225 mandibular images.
Wright RA; Bidra AS; Kuo CL
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 31590979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Morphology study of mandibular incisive canal in adults based on cone-beam computed tomography].
Kong N; Yuan H; Miao F; Xie L; Zhu L; Chen N
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 25908188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of prevalence and location of mandibular incisive canal in patients attending King Saud University Dental Hospital.
Alshamrani AS; Tokhtah RA; Al-Omar A
J Orthod Sci; 2021; 10():21. PubMed ID: 34760814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CBCT study on the prevalence, morphology and position of the mandibular incisive canal in a North-Brazilian population.
Martins VB; Oenning AC; Guimarães LC; Junqueira JL; Franco A
J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e534-e540. PubMed ID: 35912024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-beam CT assessment of implant-related anatomy landmarks of the anterior mandible in a Chinese population.
Xie L; Li T; Chen J; Yin D; Wang W; Xie Z
Surg Radiol Anat; 2019 Aug; 41(8):927-934. PubMed ID: 31069446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of intrabony nerve canals in mandibular interforaminal region by using cone-beam computed tomography and a recommendation of safe zone for implant and bone harvesting.
Yang XW; Zhang FF; Li YH; Wei B; Gong Y
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 19(3):530-538. PubMed ID: 28374431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study of the mandibular incisive canal anatomy using cone beam computed tomography.
Kabak SL; Zhuravleva NV; Melnichenko YM; Savrasova NA
Surg Radiol Anat; 2017 Jun; 39(6):647-655. PubMed ID: 27837264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective study of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve and the incisive canal using cone beam computed tomography.
Rosa MB; Sotto-Maior BS; Machado Vde C; Francischone CE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):388-92. PubMed ID: 23527339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The dimensions of the mandibular incisive canal and its spatial relationship to various anatomical landmarks of the mandible: a study using cone beam computed tomography.
Apostolakis D; Brown JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23377056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography.
Makris N; Stamatakis H; Syriopoulos K; Tsiklakis K; van der Stelt PF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):766-71. PubMed ID: 20412092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
