These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32134937)

  • 1. Assessing connectivity and the contribution of private lands to protected area networks in the United States.
    Bargelt L; Fortin MJ; Murray DL
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0228946. PubMed ID: 32134937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating private lands in conservation planning: protected areas in Britain.
    Jackson SF; Gaston KJ
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Jun; 18(4):1050-60. PubMed ID: 18536262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multiscale network analysis of protected-area connectivity for mammals in the United States.
    Minor ES; Lookingbill TR
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1549-58. PubMed ID: 20666801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protected area, easement, and rental contract data reveal five communities of land protection in the United States.
    Jackson HB; Kroetz K; Sanchirico JN; Thompson A; Armsworth PR
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02322. PubMed ID: 33655588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the effect of protected lands on the development and conservation of their surroundings.
    McDonald RI; Yuan-Farrell C; Fievet C; Moeller M; Kareiva P; Foster D; Gragson T; Kinzig A; Kuby L; Redman C
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1526-36. PubMed ID: 18173476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating and expanding the European Union's protected-area network toward potential post-2020 coverage targets.
    Müller A; Schneider UA; Jantke K
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):654-665. PubMed ID: 32022301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using sentinel nodes to evaluate changing connectivity in a protected area network.
    O'Brien P; Carr N; Bowman J
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16333. PubMed ID: 37901466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Privately protected areas increase global protected area coverage and connectivity.
    Palfrey R; Oldekop JA; Holmes G
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2022 Jun; 6(6):730-737. PubMed ID: 35393602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wild, connected, and diverse: building a more resilient system of protected areas.
    Belote RT; Dietz MS; Jenkins CN; McKinley PS; Irwin GH; Fullman TJ; Leppi JC; Aplet GH
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1050-1056. PubMed ID: 28263450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities.
    Jenkins CN; Van Houtan KS; Pimm SL; Sexton JO
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(16):5081-6. PubMed ID: 25847995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interacting Social and Environmental Predictors for the Spatial Distribution of Conservation Lands.
    Baldwin RF; Leonard PB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140540. PubMed ID: 26465155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is U.S. climatic diversity well represented within the existing federal protection network?
    Batllori E; Miller C; Parisien MA; Parks SA; Moritz MA
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(8):1898-907. PubMed ID: 29185661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accounting for spatial heterogeneity in the added conservation value of land protection when prioritizing protected areas.
    Yoon HS; Vijay V; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13960. PubMed ID: 35661264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating functional connectivity in designing networks of protected areas under climate change: A caribou case-study.
    Bauduin S; Cumming SG; St-Laurent MH; McIntire EJB
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238821. PubMed ID: 32997673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying Corridors among Large Protected Areas in the United States.
    Belote RT; Dietz MS; McRae BH; Theobald DM; McClure ML; Irwin GH; McKinley PS; Gage JA; Aplet GH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154223. PubMed ID: 27104683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subdivision design and stewardship affect bird and mammal use of conservation developments.
    Farr CM; Pejchar L; Reed SE
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jun; 27(4):1236-1252. PubMed ID: 28171704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guidelines and incentives for conservation development in local land-use regulations.
    Reed SE; Hilty JA; Theobald DM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):258-68. PubMed ID: 24001140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks.
    Robinson JL; Fordyce JA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173443. PubMed ID: 28301488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing effects of land use on landscape connectivity: loss and fragmentation of western U.S. forests.
    Theobald DM; Crooks KR; Norman JB
    Ecol Appl; 2011 Oct; 21(7):2445-58. PubMed ID: 22073634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The capacity of Australia's protected-area system to represent threatened species.
    Watson JE; Evans MC; Carwardine J; Fuller RA; Joseph LN; Segan DB; Taylor MF; Fensham RJ; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 20961332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.