202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32135641)
21. Tumor Staging of Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Recommendations From the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
Park KJ; Roma A; Singh N; Gilks CB; Oliva E; Abu-Rustum N; Ramirez PT; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2021 Mar; 40(Suppl 1):S92-S101. PubMed ID: 33570866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MRI of cervical cancer with a surgical perspective: staging, prognostic implications and pitfalls.
Balcacer P; Shergill A; Litkouhi B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2557-2571. PubMed ID: 30903231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Trend in proportion and clinicopathological characteristics of young women with stage Ⅰa2 to Ⅱa2 cervical cancer].
Wang W; Hao M; Chen CL; Liu P; Ling B; Kang S; Lu AW; Wang WL; Zhao WD; Zhu QY; Zhao YY; Zhao HW; Jin SL; Ni Y; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):666-672. PubMed ID: 31648442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The changes in FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
Sehnal B; Sláma J; Kmoníčková E; Dubová O; Zikán M
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):216-221. PubMed ID: 31324113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.
Köhler C; Mustea A; Marnitz S; Schneider A; Chiantera V; Ulrich U; Scharf JP; Martus P; Vieira MA; Tsunoda A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):503.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25986030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.
Guo L; Liu X; Wang L; Sun H; Huang K; Li X; Tang F; Li S; Yuan X; Wang C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 25867278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging.
Salib MY; Russell JHB; Stewart VR; Sudderuddin SA; Barwick TD; Rockall AG; Bharwani N
Radiographics; 2020 Oct; 40(6):1807-1822. PubMed ID: 32946322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the FIGO 2009 staging system for carcinoma of the vulva.
Tan J; Chetty N; Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S; Crandon A; Garrett A; Land R; Nascimento M; Nicklin J; Perrin L; Obermair A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Mar; 22(3):498-502. PubMed ID: 22367324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IA).
Burghardt E; Girardi F; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K
Cancer; 1991 Feb; 67(4):1037-45. PubMed ID: 1991252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of Parametrial Response by Growth Pattern in Patients With International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IIB and IIIB Cervical Cancer: Analysis of Patients From a Prospective, Multicenter Trial (EMBRACE).
Yoshida K; Jastaniyah N; Sturdza A; Lindegaard J; Segedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Haie-Meder C; Sasaki R; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Nov; 93(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 26530747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IB cervical cancer: comparison of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T.
Lin Y; Chen Z; Kuang F; Li H; Zhong Q; Ma M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):989-94. PubMed ID: 24270123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Management of stage I and II cervical cancer: a review.
Chou B; Prasad Venkatesulu B; Coleman RL; Harkenrider M; Small W
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Mar; 32(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 35256406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas, number 35, May 2002.
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 May; 99(5 Pt 1):855-67. PubMed ID: 11978302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Current classification of malignant tumours in gynecological oncology--part II].
Sehnal B; Driák D; Kmonícková E; Dvorská M; Hosová M; Citterbart K; Halaska M; Kolarík D
Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Oct; 76(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 22132636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and treatment of cervical carcinomas. Number 35, May 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jul; 78(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 12197489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of metastasectomy and chemotherapy in carcinoma of uterine cervix.
Ali N; Mansha MA; Abbasi AN; Qureshi BM
BMJ Case Rep; 2017 Aug; 2017():. PubMed ID: 28768676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina.
Kosary CL
Semin Surg Oncol; 1994; 10(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 8115784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Management of cervical cancer and surgical-pathological staging (SPS). Report of our clinical case series.
Onnis A; Marchetti M; Maggino T; Cascio A; Cerri G; Dipasquale C; Meneghello E; Romagnolo C; Rozzo ML
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1988; 9(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 3383889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Uterine cervical cancer : preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging].
Collettini F; Hamm B
Radiologe; 2011 Jul; 51(7):589-95. PubMed ID: 21688026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
