These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32140097)

  • 1. Corrigendum: Autonomic Nervous System Correlates of Speech Categorization Revealed Through Pupillometry.
    Lewis GA; Bidelman GM
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():132. PubMed ID: 32140097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autonomic Nervous System Correlates of Speech Categorization Revealed Through Pupillometry.
    Lewis GA; Bidelman GM
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1418. PubMed ID: 31998068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study.
    Borghini G; Hazan V
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():152. PubMed ID: 29593489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring listening-related effort and fatigue in school-aged children using pupillometry.
    McGarrigle R; Dawes P; Stewart AJ; Kuchinsky SE; Munro KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Sep; 161():95-112. PubMed ID: 28505505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corrigendum: Children's neural sensitivity to prosodic features of natural speech and its significance to speech development in cochlear implanted children.
    Chen Y; Luo Q; Liang M; Gao L; Yang J; Feng R; Liu J; Qiu G; Li Y; Zheng Y; Lu S
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1007925. PubMed ID: 36090290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.
    Van Engen KJ; McLaughlin DJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():56-66. PubMed ID: 29801981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening Effort Through Depth of Processing in School-Age Children.
    Hsu BC; Vanpoucke F; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):568-576. PubMed ID: 28399062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corrigendum: Neuroendocrinological and Epigenetic Mechanisms Subserving Autonomic Imbalance and HPA Dysfunction in the Metabolic Syndrome.
    Lemche E; Chaban OS; Lemche AV
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():678258. PubMed ID: 33927595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.
    Wendt D; Hietkamp RK; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective Listening Effort and Electrodermal Activity in Listening Situations with Reverberation and Noise.
    Holube I; Haeder K; Imbery C; Weber R
    Trends Hear; 2016 Oct; 20():. PubMed ID: 27698257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefit of binaural listening as revealed by speech intelligibility and listening effort.
    Rennies J; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Oct; 144(4):2147. PubMed ID: 30404476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech.
    Müller JA; Wendt D; Kollmeier B; Debener S; Brand T
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():449. PubMed ID: 30906273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
    Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.