These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32140751)

  • 1. Comparison between laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy and hysteropexy in advanced urogenital prolapse.
    Illiano E; Giannitsas K; Costantini E
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2069-2074. PubMed ID: 32140751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Pan K; Cao L; Ryan NA; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 26179552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
    Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Isenlik BS; Aksoy O; Erol O; Mulayim B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):231-238. PubMed ID: 35737006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study).
    Gagyor D; Kalis V; Smazinka M; Rusavy Z; Pilka R; Ismail KM
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 Feb; 21(1):72. PubMed ID: 33596878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urodynamic findings and functional outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.
    Illiano E; Natale F; Giannantoni A; Gubbiotti M; Balzarro M; Costantini E
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):589-594. PubMed ID: 30710159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two-year anatomical and functional outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy using light-weight Y shaped mesh for post hysterectomy vaginal prolapse.
    Fayyad A; Harris R; Ibrahim S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():139-143. PubMed ID: 35051826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    van Oudheusden AMJ; Eissing J; Terink IM; Vink MDH; van Kuijk SMJ; Bongers MY; Coolen AWM
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36112182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Costantini E; Mearini L; Lazzeri M; Bini V; Nunzi E; di Biase M; Porena M
    J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26780167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy and subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: A pilot study.
    Gracia M; Perelló M; Bataller E; Espuña M; Parellada M; Genís D; Balasch J; Carmona F
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Sep; 34(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 24975722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medium-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for middle compartment prolapse.
    Chen Y; Hua K
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 May; 137(2):164-169. PubMed ID: 28099748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
    Campagna G; Vacca L; Panico G; Rumolo V; Caramazza D; Lombisani A; Rossitto C; Gadonneix P; Scambia G; Ercoli A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):359-368. PubMed ID: 34132865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study.
    Tagliaferri V; Taccaliti C; Romano F; D'Asta M; Martulli B; Gentile C; Legge F; Ruggieri S; Guido M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2075-2081. PubMed ID: 35129036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Do we need to perform systematic supracervical hysterectomy during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy?].
    Saliba E; Nisolle M; Tchente C; De Landsheere L
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019; 47(7-8):549-554. PubMed ID: 31003018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.
    Rahmanou P; Price N; Jackson SR
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy or uterine preservation.
    Sato H; Otsuka S; Abe H; Tsukada S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Sep; 34(9):2217-2224. PubMed ID: 37052646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.