These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32143062)

  • 41. Perceptual organization, visual attention, and objecthood.
    Kimchi R; Yeshurun Y; Spehar B; Pirkner Y
    Vision Res; 2016 Sep; 126():34-51. PubMed ID: 26440865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination.
    Hollingworth A; Henderson JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):319-43. PubMed ID: 10504886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Age-related effects on perceptual and semantic encoding in memory.
    Kuo MC; Liu KP; Ting KH; Chan CC
    Neuroscience; 2014 Mar; 261():95-106. PubMed ID: 24374080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A saw is first identified as an object used on wood: ERP evidence for temporal differences between Thematic and Functional similarity relations.
    Wamain Y; Pluciennicka E; Kalénine S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():28-37. PubMed ID: 25725356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Resolving competition when naming an object in a multiple-object display.
    Oppermann F; Jescheniak JD; Görges F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 23761213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interaction between object-based attention and pertinence values shapes the attentional priority map of a multielement display.
    Gillebert CR; Petersen A; Van Meel C; Müller T; McIntyre A; Wagemans J; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):866-877. PubMed ID: 26752732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. "Semantic" and "acoustic" errors of aphasic and schizophrenic patients in a sound-picture matching task.
    Strohner H; Cohen R; Kelter S; Woll G
    Cortex; 1978 Sep; 14(3):391-403. PubMed ID: 710149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Recognition-induced forgetting does not occur for temporally grouped objects unless they are semantically related.
    Maxcey AM; Glenn H; Stansberry E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1087-1103. PubMed ID: 28523466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load.
    Belke E; Humphreys GW; Watson DG; Meyer AS; Telling AL
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1444-58. PubMed ID: 19064489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Semantic and functional relationships among objects increase the capacity of visual working memory.
    O'Donnell RE; Clement A; Brockmole JR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1151-1158. PubMed ID: 29648871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Facilitation of allocentric coding by virtue of object-semantics.
    Karimpur H; Morgenstern Y; Fiehler K
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6263. PubMed ID: 31000759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Semantic and perceptual priming activate partially overlapping brain networks as revealed by direct cortical recordings in humans.
    Khachatryan E; Wittevrongel B; Fahimi Hnazaee M; Carrette E; Dauwe I; Meurs A; Boon P; van Roost D; Van Hulle MM
    Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116204. PubMed ID: 31539593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Negative priming in naming of categorically related objects: an fMRI study.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Pringle AJ
    Cortex; 2008; 44(7):881-9. PubMed ID: 18489967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The functional arrangement of objects biases gaze direction.
    Clement A; O'Donnell RE; Brockmole JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 31044360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The return of object-based attention: selection of multiple-region objects.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1163-75. PubMed ID: 17355040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Attention during natural vision warps semantic representation across the human brain.
    Çukur T; Nishimoto S; Huth AG; Gallant JL
    Nat Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 16(6):763-70. PubMed ID: 23603707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention.
    Greenberg AS; Rosen M; Cutrone E; Behrmann M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1544-57. PubMed ID: 25832192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Object-based attention: sensory enhancement or scanning prioritization.
    Ho MC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 21632030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Interactions between visual and semantic processing during object recognition revealed by modulatory effects of age of acquisition.
    Urooj U; Cornelissen PL; Simpson MI; Wheat KL; Woods W; Barca L; Ellis AW
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():252-64. PubMed ID: 24212056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Perceptual latencies of object recognition and affect measured with the rotating spot method: Chronometric evidence for semantic primacy.
    Franikowski P; Kriegeskorte LS; Reisenzein R
    Emotion; 2021 Dec; 21(8):1744-1759. PubMed ID: 34928637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.