These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32143111)

  • 1. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard Cochlear™ Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Briggs R; O 'Leary S; Birman C; Plant K; English R; Dawson P; Risi F; Gavrilis J; Needham K; Cowan R
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107924. PubMed ID: 32143111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant.
    Plant K; Babic L
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrode impedance changes after implantation of a dexamethasone-eluting intracochlear array.
    Needham K; Stathopoulos D; Newbold C; Leavens J; Risi F; Manouchehri S; Durmo I; Cowan R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Mar; 21(2):98-109. PubMed ID: 31619141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of stimulus frequency and recording electrode on electrocochleography in Hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Tejani VD; Carroll RL; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 384():107815. PubMed ID: 31678892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term effects and potential limits of intratympanic dexamethasone-loaded hydrogels combined with dexamethasone-eluting cochlear electrodes in a low-insertion trauma Guinea pig model.
    Ahmadi N; Gausterer JC; Honeder C; Mötz M; Schöpper H; Zhu C; Saidov N; Gabor F; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 384():107825. PubMed ID: 31669876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays.
    Mussoi BS; Meibos A; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2024 Jan; 25(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 38081181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protecting against electrode insertion trauma using dexamethasone.
    Chambers S; Newbold C; Stathopoulos D; Needham K; Miller C; Risi F; Enke YL; Timbol G; Cowan R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jan; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30126345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of a method to record electrophysiological responses in direct acoustic cochlear implant subjects.
    Deprez H; Gransier R; Hofmann M; Wouters J; Verhaert N
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():217-231. PubMed ID: 30213516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term electrode impedance changes and failure prevalence in cochlear implants.
    Newbold C; Risi F; Hollow R; Yusof Y; Dowell R
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):453-60. PubMed ID: 25766491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.
    Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
    Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode.
    Hey M; Wesarg T; Mewes A; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Briggs R; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ; Aschendorff A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 30465637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 67(8):873-80. PubMed ID: 12880667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.