These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32143204)

  • 1. Engineering of brain-like tissue constructs via 3D Cell-printing technology.
    Song Y; Su X; Firouzian KF; Fang Y; Zhang T; Sun W
    Biofabrication; 2020 May; 12(3):035016. PubMed ID: 32143204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing Biological Performance of 3D-Printed, Cell-Impregnated Hybrid Constructs for Cartilage Tissue Engineering.
    Izadifar Z; Chang T; Kulyk W; Chen X; Eames BF
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2016 Mar; 22(3):173-88. PubMed ID: 26592915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional highly porous hydrogel scaffold for neural circuit dissection and modulation.
    Yan M; Wang L; Wu Y; Wang L; Lu Y
    Acta Biomater; 2023 Feb; 157():252-262. PubMed ID: 36521677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D Cell Printing of Functional Skeletal Muscle Constructs Using Skeletal Muscle-Derived Bioink.
    Choi YJ; Kim TG; Jeong J; Yi HG; Park JW; Hwang W; Cho DW
    Adv Healthc Mater; 2016 Oct; 5(20):2636-2645. PubMed ID: 27529631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3D printing of layered brain-like structures using peptide modified gellan gum substrates.
    Lozano R; Stevens L; Thompson BC; Gilmore KJ; Gorkin R; Stewart EM; in het Panhuis M; Romero-Ortega M; Wallace GG
    Biomaterials; 2015 Oct; 67():264-73. PubMed ID: 26231917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fabrication and
    Tang X; Qin Y; Xu X; Guo D; Ye W; Wu W; Li R
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():2076138. PubMed ID: 31815125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3D printing of HEK 293FT cell-laden hydrogel into macroporous constructs with high cell viability and normal biological functions.
    Ouyang L; Yao R; Chen X; Na J; Sun W
    Biofabrication; 2015 Feb; 7(1):015010. PubMed ID: 25691496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications.
    Xu T; Binder KW; Albanna MZ; Dice D; Zhao W; Yoo JJ; Atala A
    Biofabrication; 2013 Mar; 5(1):015001. PubMed ID: 23172542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biological functionality of extracellular matrix-ornamented three-dimensional printed hydroxyapatite scaffolds.
    Kumar A; Nune KC; Misra RD
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2016 Jun; 104(6):1343-51. PubMed ID: 26799466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Traditional Invasive and Synchrotron-Based Noninvasive Assessments of Three-Dimensional-Printed Hybrid Cartilage Constructs In Situ.
    Olubamiji AD; Zhu N; Chang T; Nwankwo CK; Izadifar Z; Honaramooz A; Chen X; Eames BF
    Tissue Eng Part C Methods; 2017 Mar; 23(3):156-168. PubMed ID: 28106517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fabrication of a Highly Aligned Neural Scaffold via a Table Top Stereolithography 3D Printing and Electrospinning.
    Lee SJ; Nowicki M; Harris B; Zhang LG
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2017 Jun; 23(11-12):491-502. PubMed ID: 27998214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three-dimensional printing and vacuum freeze-dried techniques for fabricating composite scaffolds.
    Sun K; Li R; Jiang W; Sun Y; Li H
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Sep; 477(4):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 27404126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ECM concentration and cell-mediated traction forces play a role in vascular network assembly in 3D bioprinted tissue.
    Zhang G; Varkey M; Wang Z; Xie B; Hou R; Atala A
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2020 Apr; 117(4):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 31840798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of Liver Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioink for Three-Dimensional Cell Printing-Based Liver Tissue Engineering.
    Lee H; Han W; Kim H; Ha DH; Jang J; Kim BS; Cho DW
    Biomacromolecules; 2017 Apr; 18(4):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 28277649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional printing of chemically crosslinked gelatin hydrogels for adipose tissue engineering.
    Contessi Negrini N; Celikkin N; Tarsini P; Farè S; Święszkowski W
    Biofabrication; 2020 Jan; 12(2):025001. PubMed ID: 31715587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrohydrodynamic jet 3D printing of PCL/PVP composite scaffold for cell culture.
    Li K; Wang D; Zhao K; Song K; Liang J
    Talanta; 2020 May; 211():120750. PubMed ID: 32070610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of scaffold design on 3D printed cell constructs.
    Souness A; Zamboni F; Walker GM; Collins MN
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2018 Feb; 106(2):533-545. PubMed ID: 28194931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
    Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
    Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Water-based polyurethane 3D printed scaffolds with controlled release function for customized cartilage tissue engineering.
    Hung KC; Tseng CS; Dai LG; Hsu SH
    Biomaterials; 2016 Mar; 83():156-68. PubMed ID: 26774563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.
    Heid S; Boccaccini AR
    Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 113():1-22. PubMed ID: 32622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.