These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32143683)

  • 1. What is the effectiveness of various invitation methods to a colonoscopy in the early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer? Protocol of a systematic review.
    Stark UA; Frese T; Unverzagt S; Bauer A
    Syst Rev; 2020 Mar; 9(1):49. PubMed ID: 32143683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of tailored communication intervention in increasing colonoscopy screening rates amongst first-degree relatives of individuals with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bai Y; Wong CL; He X; Wang C; So WKW
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Jan; 101():103397. PubMed ID: 31683227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.
    Regge D; Iussich G; Senore C; Correale L; Hassan C; Bert A; Montemezzi S; Segnan N
    Trials; 2014 Mar; 15():97. PubMed ID: 24678896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing organized colorectal cancer screening programs in Europe-protocol for a systematic review of determinants and strategies.
    Albers B; Auer R; Caci L; Nyantakyi E; Plys E; Podmore C; Riegel F; Selby K; Walder J; Clack L
    Syst Rev; 2023 Feb; 12(1):26. PubMed ID: 36849979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Invitation letters increase participation in colorectal cancer screening - results from an observational study.
    Zhan T; Hielscher T; Bilge A; Giese T; Schäfer C; Riemann JF; Ebert MP; Belle S
    Z Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 55(12):1307-1312. PubMed ID: 29212101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.
    Honein-Abouhaidar GN; Kastner M; Vuong V; Perrier L; Rabeneck L; Tinmouth J; Straus S; Baxter NN
    BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e004508. PubMed ID: 24578543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
    Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Kirby PL; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Little M; Gray A; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
    Health Technol Assess; 2022 May; 26(26):1-156. PubMed ID: 35635015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Participation in Competing Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized Health Services Study (PICCOLINO Study).
    Pilonis ND; Bugajski M; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Pisera M; Pawlak E; Regula J; Kaminski MF
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Mar; 160(4):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 33307024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual chromoendoscopy for the real-time assessment of colorectal polyps in vivo: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Picot J; Rose M; Cooper K; Pickett K; Lord J; Harris P; Whyte S; Böhning D; Shepherd J
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Dec; 21(79):1-308. PubMed ID: 29271339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interventions to improve the quality of screening-related colonoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
    Khan R; Vaska M; Ruan Y; Bansal R; Gimpaya N; Scaffidi MA; Brenner D; Leontiadis GI; Grover SC; Forbes N
    BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e061855. PubMed ID: 36424103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The risk of bleeding and perforation from sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Kindt IS; Martiny FHJ; Gram EG; Bie AKL; Jauernik CP; Rahbek OJ; Nielsen SB; Siersma V; Bang CW; Brodersen JB
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292797. PubMed ID: 37906565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of cuff-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Q; Gao HD; Liu CC; Zhang H; Li XH; Wu J; Zhang XK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 May; 99(20):e20243. PubMed ID: 32443361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in early diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Mehta A; Kumar H; Yazji K; Wireko AA; Sivanandan Nagarajan J; Ghosh B; Nahas A; Morales Ojeda L; Anand A; Sharath M; Huang H; Garg T; Isik A
    Int J Surg; 2023 Apr; 109(4):946-952. PubMed ID: 36917126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of gender-specific invitation letters on utilization of colorectal cancer screening.
    Zhan T; Hielscher T; Eckardt M; Giese T; Schäfer C; Riemann JF; Ebert MP; Belle S
    Z Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 57(9):1051-1058. PubMed ID: 31525797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Participation in colorectal cancer screening trials after first-time invitation: a systematic review.
    Khalid-de Bakker C; Jonkers D; Smits K; Mesters I; Masclee A; Stockbrügger R
    Endoscopy; 2011 Dec; 43(12):1059-86. PubMed ID: 22135196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.