BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3214508)

  • 1. Cervical cytology in Greenland and occurrence of cervical carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and dysplasia. Extent and impact of uncoordinated screening activity 1976-1985.
    Højgaard Nielsen N; Jensen H; Hansen PK
    Arctic Med Res; 1988 Oct; 47(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 3214508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [1-year results in the detection of precanceroses and carcinoma of the uterine cervix in Baranja].
    Milojković M; Pajtler M; Makarović Z; Lederer B; Jarcov R
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1986; 26(5-6):119-22. PubMed ID: 3657276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervicovaginal cytology in an indigent population. Comparison of results for 1964, 1981 and 1989.
    Costa MJ; Grimes C; Tackett E; Naib ZM
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 1994635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increase in abnormal cervical cytology.
    Heyerdahl-O'Dowd TD
    Ir Med J; 1982 Nov; 75(11):419-22. PubMed ID: 7174261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia.
    Boyes DA; Morrison B; Knox EG; Draper GJ; Miller AB
    Clin Invest Med; 1982; 5(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 7116711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arkansas cervical cancer program.
    Steinkamp RC; Roman-Lopez J; Kenney JA; Hairston MG; Hylton S; Hammett WN; Marsh S; Becton P; Collier S
    J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 76(1):312-22. PubMed ID: 6444400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The mode ages of women with cervical dysplasia.
    Carson HJ; DeMay RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 8355947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of dubious and positive cervical cytological examinations for neoplasms and correlated histological examinations made 1970-1980 at the Savona Hospital].
    Ballerini D; De Pirro W; Nadin C
    Pathologica; 1981; 73(1027):793-803. PubMed ID: 7043381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Population screening for cervix carcinoma in the city of Rotterdam, 1st round].
    van der Lee-Bijlsma A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1981 Dec; 125(49):2012-5. PubMed ID: 7322220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adolescents with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Schydlower M; Greeenberg H; Patterson PH
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1981 Nov; 20(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 7297012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cancer screening: précis and critique of a recent Canadian report.
    Chiavetta J; Leader SR
    Med J Aust; 1977 Jan 1-8; 1(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 840075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Prevalence of preclinical lesions of the cervix uteri].
    Dabancens A
    Rev Med Chil; 1986 Jun; 114(6):586-90. PubMed ID: 3575955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening.
    van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP; Gaillard HL; Go DM
    Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 3604538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The effectiveness of cervical cytology screening for cervical cancer (author's transl)].
    Soost HJ; Bockmühl B; Zock H
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1979 Sep; 104(38):1331-5. PubMed ID: 477559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of the hormonal condition on the diagnostic effectiveness of colpocytological screening of cervical carcinoma].
    Brizio PD; Armentano G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1979 Dec; 31(12):899-903. PubMed ID: 550108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in colposcopy.
    Navarre GL
    J Reprod Med; 1981 Jan; 26(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7205805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initial screening for cervical carcinoma in Praestø Amt 1972-1975.
    Berget A; Olsen J; Poll P
    Dan Med Bull; 1978 Dec; 25(6):230-2. PubMed ID: 720143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in sexually active teenagers and young adults. Results of data analysis of mass Papanicolaou screening of 796,337 women in the United States in 1981.
    Sadeghi SB; Hsieh EW; Gunn SW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 148(6):726-9. PubMed ID: 6702940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ detected by directed biopsy].
    Milojković M; Makarović Z; Pajtler M
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1989; 29(5-6):198-200. PubMed ID: 2640269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prescreening methods for gynecological cytology (author's transl)].
    Soost HJ
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1977 Jun; 119(25):849-52. PubMed ID: 408603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.