These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32145368)

  • 21. Evidence-based urology: understanding GRADE methodology.
    Gonzalez-Padilla DA; Dahm P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1230-1233. PubMed ID: 34598913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. GRADE equity guidelines 1: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: introduction and rationale.
    Welch VA; Akl EA; Guyatt G; Pottie K; Eslava-Schmalbach J; Ansari MT; de Beer H; Briel M; Dans T; Dans I; Hultcrantz M; Jull J; Katikireddi SV; Meerpohl J; Morton R; Mosdol A; Petkovic J; Schünemann HJ; Sharaf RN; Singh JA; Stanev R; Tonia T; Tristan M; Vitols S; Watine J; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():59-67. PubMed ID: 28412464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence.
    Welch VA; Akl EA; Pottie K; Ansari MT; Briel M; Christensen R; Dans A; Dans L; Eslava-Schmalbach J; Guyatt G; Hultcrantz M; Jull J; Katikireddi SV; Lang E; Matovinovic E; Meerpohl JJ; Morton RL; Mosdol A; Murad MH; Petkovic J; Schünemann H; Sharaf R; Shea B; Singh JA; Solà I; Stanev R; Stein A; Thabaneii L; Tonia T; Tristan M; Vitols S; Watine J; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():76-83. PubMed ID: 28389397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Above the GRADE: Evaluation of Guidelines in Critical Care Medicine.
    Sims CR; Warner MA; Stelfox HT; Hyder JA
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):109-113. PubMed ID: 30303840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evidence-informed guidelines in oral health: insights from a systematic survey.
    Verdugo-Paiva F; Rojas-Gómez AM; Wielandt V; Peña J; Silva-Ruz I; Novillo F; Ávila-Oliver C; Bonfill-Cosp X; Glick M; Carrasco-Labra A
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):746. PubMed ID: 38937727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A number of factors explain why WHO guideline developers make strong recommendations inconsistent with GRADE guidance.
    Alexander PE; Gionfriddo MR; Li SA; Bero L; Stoltzfus RJ; Neumann I; Brito JP; Djulbegovic B; Montori VM; Norris SL; Schünemann HJ; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():111-22. PubMed ID: 26399903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Applying GRADE to a network meta-analysis of antidepressants led to more conservative conclusions.
    Bonner A; Alexander PE; Brignardello-Petersen R; Furukawa TA; Siemieniuk RA; Zhang Y; Wiercioch W; Florez ID; Fei Y; Agarwal A; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Beyene J; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():87-98. PubMed ID: 29800689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Current status and problems in developing clinical guidelines for Chinese medicine and integrative medicine].
    Chen KJ; Jiang YR
    Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 7(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 19361357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How do guideline developers identify, incorporate and report patient preferences? An international cross-sectional survey.
    Blackwood J; Armstrong MJ; Schaefer C; Graham ID; Knaapen L; Straus SE; Urquhart R; Gagliardi AR
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):458. PubMed ID: 32448198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Integrative assessment of evidence in healthcare: the GRADE system].
    Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 19645339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. GRADE guidance 39: using GRADE-ADOLOPMENT to adopt, adapt or create contextualized recommendations from source guidelines and evidence syntheses.
    Klugar M; Lotfi T; Darzi AJ; Reinap M; Klugarová J; Kantorová L; Xia J; Brignardello-Petersen R; Pokorná A; Hazlewood G; Munn Z; Morgan RL; Toews I; Neumann I; Bhatarasakoon P; Stein AT; McCaul M; Mathioudakis AG; D'Anci KE; Leontiadis GI; Naude C; Vasanthan LT; Khabsa J; Bala MM; Mustafa R; DiValerio Gibbs K; Nieuwlaat R; Santesso N; Pieper D; Mokrane S; Soghier I; Lertwatthanawilat W; Wiercioch W; Sultan S; Rozmarinová J; Drapačová P; Song Y; Amer M; Amer YS; Sayfi S; Verstijnen IM; Shin ES; Saz-Parkinson Z; Pottie K; Ruspi A; Marušić A; Saif-Ur-Rahman KM; Rojas MX; Akl EA; Schünemann HJ;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Oct; 174():111494. PubMed ID: 39117011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [GRADE: from grading the evidence to developing recommendations. A description of the system and a proposal regarding the transferability of the results of clinical research to clinical practice].
    Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 19839216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. GRADE guidelines: 22. The GRADE approach for tests and strategies-from test accuracy to patient-important outcomes and recommendations.
    Schünemann HJ; Mustafa RA; Brozek J; Santesso N; Bossuyt PM; Steingart KR; Leeflang M; Lange S; Trenti T; Langendam M; Scholten R; Hooft L; Murad MH; Jaeschke R; Rutjes A; Singh J; Helfand M; Glasziou P; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Akl EA; Deeks JJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():69-82. PubMed ID: 30738926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. World Health Organization strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence (study quality) are frequent and often inconsistent with GRADE guidance.
    Alexander PE; Brito JP; Neumann I; Gionfriddo MR; Bero L; Djulbegovic B; Stoltzfus R; Montori VM; Norris SL; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():98-106. PubMed ID: 25618534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations].
    Kaminski-Hartenthaler A; Meerpohl JJ; Gartlehner G; Kien C; Langer G; Wipplinger J; Schünemann HJ
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2014; 108(7):413-20. PubMed ID: 25444300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adding a "GRADE" to the quality appraisal of rheumatoid arthritis guidelines identifies limitations beyond AGREE-II.
    Hazlewood GS; Akhavan P; Schieir O; Marshall D; Tomlinson G; Bykerk V; Bombardier C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1274-85. PubMed ID: 25240769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Guidelines rarely used GRADE and applied methods inconsistently: A methodological study of Australian guidelines.
    Barker TH; Dias M; Stern C; Porritt K; Wiechula R; Aromataris E; Brennan S; Schünemann HJ; Munn Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():125-134. PubMed ID: 33130237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: addressing incoherence.
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Mustafa RA; Siemieniuk RAC; Murad MH; Agoritsas T; Izcovich A; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():77-85. PubMed ID: 30529648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Introduction to the GRADE approach for guideline development: considerations for physical therapist practice.
    Austin TM; Richter RR; Sebelski CA
    Phys Ther; 2014 Nov; 94(11):1652-9. PubMed ID: 25035268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an american college of chest physicians task force.
    Guyatt G; Gutterman D; Baumann MH; Addrizzo-Harris D; Hylek EM; Phillips B; Raskob G; Lewis SZ; Schünemann H
    Chest; 2006 Jan; 129(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 16424429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.