These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32145368)

  • 41. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Guidelines are made more transparent with the GRADE method: considerations for recommendations are explicit in the new method].
    Boluyt N; Rottier BL; Langendam MW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(25):A4379. PubMed ID: 22748366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Application of GRADE: making evidence-based recommendations about diagnostic tests in clinical practice guidelines.
    Hsu J; Brożek JL; Terracciano L; Kreis J; Compalati E; Stein AT; Fiocchi A; Schünemann HJ
    Implement Sci; 2011 Jun; 6():62. PubMed ID: 21663655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The role of Cochrane reviews in informing international guidelines: a case study of using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system to develop World Health Organization guidelines for the psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence.
    Davoli M; Amato L; Clark N; Farrell M; Hickman M; Hill S; Magrini N; Poznyak V; Schünemann HJ
    Addiction; 2015 Jun; 110(6):891-8. PubMed ID: 25490943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A case for clarity, consistency, and helpfulness: state-of-the-art clinical practice guidelines in endocrinology using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system.
    Swiglo BA; Murad MH; Schünemann HJ; Kunz R; Vigersky RA; Guyatt GH; Montori VM
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2008 Mar; 93(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 18171699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. WFSBP guidelines on how to grade treatment evidence for clinical guideline development.
    Hasan A; Bandelow B; Yatham LN; Berk M; Falkai P; Möller HJ; Kasper S;
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2019 Jan; 20(1):2-16. PubMed ID: 30526182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. GRADE concept 6: a novel application of external indirect evidence into GRADE ratings of evidence certainty in network meta-analysis.
    Hao Q; Gao Y; Zhao Y; Murad MH; Mustafa R; Ansari MT; Schünemann HJ; Rind DM; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 163():95-101. PubMed ID: 37739191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Introducing GRADE across the NICE clinical guideline program.
    Thornton J; Alderson P; Tan T; Turner C; Latchem S; Shaw E; Ruiz F; Reken S; Mugglestone MA; Hill J; Neilson J; Westby M; Francis K; Whittington C; Siddiqui F; Sharma T; Kelly V; Ayiku L; Chamberlain K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 66(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 22406196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Patient involvement in guidelines is poor five years after institute of medicine standards: review of guideline methodologies.
    Armstrong MJ; Bloom JA
    Res Involv Engagem; 2017; 3():19. PubMed ID: 29062544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. GRADE Guidelines 28: Use of GRADE for the assessment of evidence about prognostic factors: rating certainty in identification of groups of patients with different absolute risks.
    Foroutan F; Guyatt G; Zuk V; Vandvik PO; Alba AC; Mustafa R; Vernooij R; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Munn Z; Roshanov P; Riley R; Schandelmaier S; Kuijpers T; Siemieniuk R; Canelo-Aybar C; Schunemann H; Iorio A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 May; 121():62-70. PubMed ID: 31982539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. GRADE pearls and pitfalls-Part 2: Clinical practice guidelines.
    Granholm A; Al Duhailib Z; Alhazzani W; Oczkowski S; Belley-Cote E; Møller MH
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2024 May; 68(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 38380849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Most guideline organizations lack explicit guidance in how to incorporate cost considerations.
    Sanabria AJ; Kotzeva A; Selva Olid A; Pequeño S; Vernooij RWM; Martínez García L; Zhang Y; Solà I; Thornton J; Alonso-Coello P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 116():72-83. PubMed ID: 31430507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of guideline recommendations on oral medications for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.
    Bennett WL; Odelola OA; Wilson LM; Bolen S; Selvaraj S; Robinson KA; Bass EB; Puhan MA
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Jan; 156(1 Pt 1):27-36. PubMed ID: 22213492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quality of evidence is a key determinant for making a strong GRADE guidelines recommendation.
    Djulbegovic B; Kumar A; Kaufman RM; Tobian A; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):727-32. PubMed ID: 25766057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Eastern Association of the Surgery of Trauma approach to practice management guideline development using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
    Kerwin AJ; Haut ER; Burns JB; Como JJ; Haider A; Stassen N; Dahm P;
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Nov; 73(5 Suppl 4):S283-7. PubMed ID: 23114482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Defining certainty of net benefit: a GRADE concept paper.
    Alper BS; Oettgen P; Kunnamo I; Iorio A; Ansari MT; Murad MH; Meerpohl JJ; Qaseem A; Hultcrantz M; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt G;
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e027445. PubMed ID: 31167868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.
    Brożek JL; Akl EA; Compalati E; Kreis J; Terracciano L; Fiocchi A; Ueffing E; Andrews J; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Lang DM; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lethaby A; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Watine J; Afilalo M; Welch V; Montedori A; Abraha I; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [GRADE equity guidelines 1: Considering health equity in GRADE guideline development - introduction and rationale].
    Teufer B; Nußbaumer-Streit B; Ebenberger A; Titscher V; Conrad S; Langer G; Töws I; Gartlehner G
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Oct; 146():53-59. PubMed ID: 31537503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence].
    Ebenberger A; Nussbaumer-Streit B; Teufer B; Langer G; Schwingshackl L; Töws I; Gartlehner G
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2020 Aug; 153-154():119-125. PubMed ID: 32727700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.