These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32146285)

  • 1. A novel quantitative measure of image quality in fluoroscopy.
    Kenny P; Costello D; McCarthy D; Kenny E
    Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():150-160. PubMed ID: 32146285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
    Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extended detail contrasts for TO.10 use on flat panel detector fluoroscopy systems.
    McCarthy D; Kenny P
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 94(1122):20201422. PubMed ID: 33956486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative image quality evaluation of pixel-binning in a flat-panel detector for x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Srinivas Y; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 14761029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Edge enhancement algorithm for low-dose X-ray fluoroscopic imaging.
    Lee MS; Park CH; Kang MG
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Dec; 152():45-52. PubMed ID: 29054260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY: A PHANTOM-BASED STUDY.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Gatzounis GD; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30508126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
    Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of variable temporal averaging in digital fluoroscopy.
    Kotre CJ; Guibelalde E
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):675-8. PubMed ID: 15326047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How should low-contrast detail detectability be measured in fluoroscopy?
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M
    Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2564-76. PubMed ID: 15487739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy.
    Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Workman A; Yip M; Wells K; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2721-34. PubMed ID: 22559643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Update on the recommended viewing protocol for FAXIL threshold contrast detail detectability test objects used in television fluoroscopy.
    Launders JH; McArdle S; Workman A; Cowen AR
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):70-7. PubMed ID: 7881886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of an image planning system for kilovoltage image-guided radiation therapy.
    Thapa BB; Molloy JA
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061703. PubMed ID: 23718582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
    Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of the effects of the FineView algorithm for full field digital mammography.
    Urbanczyk H; McDonagh E; Marshall NW; Castellano I
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 22429938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation dose reduction with frame rate conversion in X-ray fluoroscopic imaging systems with flat panel detector: basic study and clinical retrospective analysis.
    Sakai N; Tabei K; Sato J; Imae T; Suzuki Y; Takenaka S; Yano K; Abe O
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):985-992. PubMed ID: 29987416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.