These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32146416)

  • 21. Environmental and economic sustainability of poultry litter gasification for electricity and heat generation.
    Jeswani HK; Whiting A; Martin A; Azapagic A
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():182-191. PubMed ID: 31351603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CO2 gasification reactivity of biomass char: catalytic influence of alkali, alkaline earth and transition metal salts.
    Lahijani P; Zainal ZA; Mohamed AR; Mohammadi M
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():288-95. PubMed ID: 23880130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CO
    He Q; Guo Q; Ding L; Wei J; Yu G
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Dec; 293():122087. PubMed ID: 31493729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis, gasification and incineration waste-to-energy technologies: Theoretical analysis and case study of commercial plants.
    Dong J; Tang Y; Nzihou A; Chi Y; Weiss-Hortala E; Ni M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():744-753. PubMed ID: 29396338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Health risk assessment as an approach to manage an old landfill and to propose integrated solid waste treatment: A case study in Italy.
    Paladino O; Massabò M
    Waste Manag; 2017 Oct; 68():344-354. PubMed ID: 28736047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Techno-economic analysis of wastewater sludge gasification: a decentralized urban perspective.
    Lumley NP; Ramey DF; Prieto AL; Braun RJ; Cath TY; Porter JM
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jun; 161():385-94. PubMed ID: 24727699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Co-gasification of coal and biomass: Synergy, characterization and reactivity of the residual char.
    Hu J; Shao J; Yang H; Lin G; Chen Y; Wang X; Zhang W; Chen H
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 244(Pt 1):1-7. PubMed ID: 28777985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The carbon dioxide gasification characteristics of biomass char samples and their effect on coal gasification reactivity during co-gasification.
    Mafu LD; Neomagus HWJP; Everson RC; Okolo GN; Strydom CA; Bunt JR
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jun; 258():70-78. PubMed ID: 29524689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Techno-economic study for a gasification plant processing residues of sewage sludge and solid recovered fuels.
    Alves O; Calado L; Panizio RM; Gonçalves M; Monteiro E; Brito P
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jul; 131():148-162. PubMed ID: 34130077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ash of palm empty fruit bunch as a natural catalyst for promoting the CO₂ gasification reactivity of biomass char.
    Lahijani P; Zainal ZA; Mohamed AR; Mohammadi M
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Mar; 132():351-5. PubMed ID: 23195653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interaction and its induced inhibiting or synergistic effects during co-gasification of coal char and biomass char.
    Ding L; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Huang J; Fang Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Dec; 173():11-20. PubMed ID: 25280109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CO
    Phounglamcheik A; Vila R; Kienzl N; Wang L; Hedayati A; Broström M; Ramser K; Engvall K; Skreiberg Ø; Robinson R; Umeki K
    ACS Omega; 2021 Dec; 6(49):34115-34128. PubMed ID: 34926959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Characterization and valorization of biomass char: a comparison with biomass ash.
    Trivedi NS; Mandavgane SA; Chaurasia A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(4):3458-3467. PubMed ID: 29152698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Study on CO₂ gasification properties and kinetics of biomass chars and anthracite char.
    Wang G; Zhang J; Hou X; Shao J; Geng W
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Feb; 177():66-73. PubMed ID: 25479395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Techno-economic and environmental sustainability of biomass waste conversion based on thermocatalytic reforming.
    Casson Moreno V; Iervolino G; Tugnoli A; Cozzani V
    Waste Manag; 2020 Jan; 101():106-115. PubMed ID: 31605925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Techno-economic comparison of biojet fuel production from lignocellulose, vegetable oil and sugar cane juice.
    Diederichs GW; Ali Mandegari M; Farzad S; Görgens JF
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 216():331-9. PubMed ID: 27259188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. CO
    Gupta A; Thengane SK; Mahajani S
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Sep; 263():180-191. PubMed ID: 29738981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Co-gasification of bituminous coal and hydrochar derived from municipal solid waste: Reactivity and synergy.
    Wei J; Guo Q; He Q; Ding L; Yoshikawa K; Yu G
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Sep; 239():482-489. PubMed ID: 28544988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Techno-economic analysis of a food waste valorization process via microalgae cultivation and co-production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed from algal biomass and food waste.
    Kwan TH; Pleissner D; Lau KY; Venus J; Pommeret A; Lin CS
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Dec; 198():292-9. PubMed ID: 26402872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Economic evaluation of improvements in a waste-to-energy combined heat and power plant.
    Eboh FC; Andersson BÅ; Richards T
    Waste Manag; 2019 Dec; 100():75-83. PubMed ID: 31525675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.