These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32147391)

  • 1. Introducing a novel in vivo method to access visual performance during dewetting process of contact lens surface.
    Kolbe O; Zimmermann F; Marx S; Sickenberger W
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Aug; 43(4):359-365. PubMed ID: 32147391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The utility of measuring tear film break-up time for prescribing contact lenses.
    Mousavi M; Jesus DA; Garaszczuk IK; Szczesna-Iskander DH; Iskander DR
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Feb; 41(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 28863983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel in-vitro method for assessing contact lens surface dewetting: Non-invasive keratograph dry-up time (NIK-DUT).
    Marx S; Sickenberger W
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Dec; 40(6):382-388. PubMed ID: 28847466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective Measures of Pre-lens Tear Film Dynamics versus Visual Responses.
    Szczesna-Iskander DH; Alonso-Caneiro D; Iskander DR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):872-80. PubMed ID: 27232894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Solution-related in Vitro Dewetting Behavior of Various Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Marx S; Baluschev S; Sickenberger W
    Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Oct; 99(10):750-757. PubMed ID: 36095059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compatibility of phospholipid liposomal spray with silicone hydrogel contact lens wear.
    Wang MT; Ganesalingam K; Loh CS; Alberquerque T; Al-Kanani S; Misra SL; Craig JP
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Feb; 40(1):53-58. PubMed ID: 27908604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meibomian glands structure in daily disposable soft contact lens wearers: a one-year follow-up study.
    Llorens-Quintana C; Garaszczuk IK; Szczesna-Iskander DH
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Sep; 40(5):607-616. PubMed ID: 32716128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating tear film spread and stability through tear hydrodynamics.
    Varikooty J; Keir N; Simpson T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 89(8):E1119-24. PubMed ID: 22820473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort, tear stability and ocular physiology.
    Vidal-Rohr M; Wolffsohn JS; Davies LN; Cerviño A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Feb; 41(1):117-121. PubMed ID: 28927731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of artificial tears on visual performance in subjects with dry eye.
    Ridder WH; Tomlinson A; Paugh J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 82(9):835-42. PubMed ID: 16189494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crossover Evaluation of Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
    Wolffsohn JS; Mroczkowska S; Hunt OA; Bilkhu P; Drew T; Sheppard A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 92(11):1063-8. PubMed ID: 26390350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection.
    Müller C; Marx S; Wittekind J; Sickenberger W
    Clin Optom (Auckl); 2020; 12():17-26. PubMed ID: 32184693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-contact lens and pre-corneal tear film kinetics.
    Guillon M; Dumbleton K; Theodoratos P; Patel K; Gupta R; Patel T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Jun; 42(3):246-252. PubMed ID: 30819629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective clinical performance of 'comfort-enhanced' daily disposable soft contact lenses.
    Wolffsohn JS; Hunt OA; Chowdhury A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2010 Apr; 33(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 20149716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a 0.9% sodium chloride ophthalmic solution on the ocular surface of symptomatic contact lens wearers.
    Barabino S; Rolando M; Camicione P; Chen W; Calabria G
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2005 Feb; 40(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15825529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association Between Contact Lens Discomfort and Pre-lens Tear Film Kinetics.
    Guillon M; Dumbleton KA; Theodoratos P; Wong S; Patel K; Banks G; Patel T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):881-91. PubMed ID: 27092926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective Analysis of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection.
    Marx S; Eckstein J; Sickenberger W
    Clin Optom (Auckl); 2020; 12():203-211. PubMed ID: 33244285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of contact lens wear and visual display terminal work on ocular surface and tear functions in office workers.
    Kojima T; Ibrahim OM; Wakamatsu T; Tsuyama A; Ogawa J; Matsumoto Y; Dogru M; Tsubota K
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Dec; 152(6):933-940.e2. PubMed ID: 21871600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of artificial tears on visual performance in normal subjects wearing contact lenses.
    Ridder WH; Tomlinson A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 80(12):826-31. PubMed ID: 14688546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative effect of lens care solutions on blink rate, ocular discomfort and visual performance.
    Yang SN; Tai YC; Sheedy JE; Kinoshita B; Lampa M; Kern JR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):412-20. PubMed ID: 22775005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.