275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32148066)
1. Diffusion-weighted MRI versus FDG-PET/CT for diagnosing pancreatic cancer: an indirect comparison meta-analysis.
Que R; Chen Y; Tao Z; Ge B; Li M; Fu Z; Li Y
Acta Radiol; 2020 Nov; 61(11):1473-1483. PubMed ID: 32148066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Machado Medeiros T; Altmayer S; Watte G; Zanon M; Basso Dias A; Henz Concatto N; Hoefel Paes J; Mattiello R; de Souza Santos F; Mohammed TL; Verma N; Hochhegger B
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3641-3649. PubMed ID: 32125513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Staging/restaging performance of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A review and meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lin CL; Kao CH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():158-165. PubMed ID: 30292261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging compared with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for pancreatic malignancy: a meta-analysis using a hierarchical regression model.
Wu LM; Hu JN; Hua J; Liu MJ; Chen J; Xu JR
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1027-35. PubMed ID: 22414092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic performance of CT versus FDG PET-CT for the detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Daamen LA; Groot VP; Goense L; Wessels FJ; Borel Rinkes IH; Intven MPW; van Santvoort HC; Molenaar IQ
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():128-136. PubMed ID: 30150034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating pulmonary lesions: an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies.
Liu J; Xia X; Zou Q; Xie X; Lei Y; Wan Q; Li X
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):37. PubMed ID: 36899303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and
Noij DP; Martens RM; Zwezerijnen B; Koopman T; de Bree R; Hoekstra OS; de Graaf P; Castelijns JA
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():20-25. PubMed ID: 30292267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET versus magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yin Y; Liu X; Yang X; Guo J; Wang Q; Chen L
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 30121323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDG-avid presacral soft tissue mass in previously treated rectal cancer: Diagnostic outcome and additional value of MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging.
Pennings JP; de Haas RJ; Murshid KJA; de Jong KP; Dierckx RAJO; Kwee TC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Apr; 45(4):606-612. PubMed ID: 30594404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis.
Zhang C; Liang Z; Liu W; Zeng X; Mo Y
BMC Cancer; 2023 Jan; 23(1):37. PubMed ID: 36624425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging: competition or synergy as diagnostic methods to manage sarcoma of the uterus? A systematic review of the literature.
Dubreuil J; Tordo J; Rubello D; Giammarile F; Skanjeti A
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 27898647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct comparison of diagnostic accuracies of F-18 FDG PET and MRI for detection of bone marrow involvement in lymphoma patients; A meta-analysis.
Kim K; Kim SJ
Leuk Res; 2020 Dec; 99():106475. PubMed ID: 33189988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparison of 18-FDG PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of multiple myeloma.
Mesguich C; Hulin C; Latrabe V; Lascaux A; Bordenave L; Hindié E; Marit G
Ann Hematol; 2020 Dec; 99(12):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 32951093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and
Noij DP; Martens RM; Koopman T; Hoekstra OS; Comans EFI; Zwezerijnen B; de Bree R; de Graaf P; Castelijns JA
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2018 Dec; 30(12):780-792. PubMed ID: 30318343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy.
Ergul N; Kadioglu H; Yildiz S; Yucel SB; Gucin Z; Erdogan EB; Aydin M; Muslumanoglu M
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 25013091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detection of primary and metastatic malignancies: a meta-analysis.
Li B; Li Q; Nie W; Liu S
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 24355655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with
Diez AIG; Fuster D; Morata L; Torres F; Garcia R; Poggio D; Sotes S; Del Amo M; Isern-Kebschull J; Pomes J; Soriano A; Brugnara L; Tomas X
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109299. PubMed ID: 33032207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Value of Whole-Body DWI With Background Body Suppression Plus Calculation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3 T Versus
Sun W; Li M; Gu Y; Sun Z; Qiu Z; Zhou Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Feb; 214(2):446-454. PubMed ID: 31799866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic value of using 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in immunocompetent patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zou Y; Tong J; Leng H; Jiang J; Pan M; Chen Z
Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(25):41518-41528. PubMed ID: 28514747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
