340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32148120)
1. Complications and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jan; 41(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 32148120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term Outcomes of Non-robotic Single-incision Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Surgical Technique.
Liu J; Kohn J; Wu C; Guan Z; Guan X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):721-727. PubMed ID: 31146027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse in the elderly: safety and outcomes.
Sato H; Abe H; Ikeda A; Miyagawa T; Sato K; Tsukada S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 33890540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medium-term outcomes 2 years after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Sato H; Otsuka S; Abe H; Tsukada S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 42(7):3336-3341. PubMed ID: 36149283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urodynamic findings and functional outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.
Illiano E; Natale F; Giannantoni A; Gubbiotti M; Balzarro M; Costantini E
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):589-594. PubMed ID: 30710159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvaginal single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Li J; Sima Y; Hu C; Wang X; Lu Z; Hua K; Chen Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Mar; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35246079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgical management of female pelvic organ prolapse with and without urinary incontinence: A single center experience.
Cormio L; Mancini V; Liuzzi G; d'Altilia N; Carrieri G
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Sep; 96(39):e7914. PubMed ID: 28953613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Baines G; Price N; Jefferis H; Cartwright R; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus pelvic organ prolapse suspension for surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study.
Tagliaferri V; Taccaliti C; Romano F; D'Asta M; Martulli B; Gentile C; Legge F; Ruggieri S; Guido M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2075-2081. PubMed ID: 35129036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term outcomes of modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse: a 3-year prospective study.
Liang S; Zhu L; Song X; Xu T; Sun Z; Lang J
Menopause; 2016 Jul; 23(7):765-70. PubMed ID: 27138745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mesh-related complications in single-incision transvaginal mesh (TVM) and laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexy (LASC).
Li YL; Chang YW; Yang TH; Wu LY; Chuang FC; Kung FT; Huang KH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 32039799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medium term anatomical and functional outcomes following modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Cortes ARB; Hayashi T; Nomura M; Sawada Y; Tokiwa S; Nagae M
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3111-3121. PubMed ID: 35089412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy posthysterectomy: intraoperative feasibility and safety in obese women compared with women of normal weight.
Mahoney C; Scott G; Dwyer L; Reid F; Ward K; Smith A; Kearney R
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Dec; 30(12):2041-2048. PubMed ID: 30810783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative adverse events after minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Unger CA; Paraiso MF; Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Ridgeway B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):547.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.
Ichikawa M; Kaseki H; Akira S
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2018 Feb; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 29485251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
