These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32148644)

  • 1. Somatosensory Perception of Running Shoe Mass may be influenced by Extended Wearing Time or Inclusion of a Personal Reference Shoe, Depending on Testing Method.
    Saxton JG; Mardis BR; Kliethermes CL; Senchina DS
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2020; 13(6):342-357. PubMed ID: 32148644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Somatosensory perception of running shoe mass.
    Slade SJ; Greenya JG; Kliethermes CL; Senchina DS
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(6):912-20. PubMed ID: 24678802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory Perception of Varied Shoe Masses in Running.
    Keshvari B; Alevras S; Senner V
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2023; 113(1):. PubMed ID: 36905625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subjective evaluation of running footwear depends on country and assessment method: a bi-national study.
    Kong PW; Lim CY; Ding R; Sterzing T
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(9):1589-604. PubMed ID: 25746342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Shoe Top Visual Patterns on Shoe Wearers' Width Perception and Dynamic Stability.
    Law JCL; Wong TWL; Chan DCL; Lam WK
    Percept Mot Skills; 2018 Aug; 125(4):682-695. PubMed ID: 29929435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of heel design on lower extremity biomechanics and comfort perception in overground running.
    Liu ZL; Lam WK; Zhang X; Vanwanseele B; Liu H
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Jan; 39(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 32881635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Running Economy While Running in Shoes Categorized as Maximal Cushioning.
    Mercer MA; Stone TM; Young JC; Mercer JA
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2018; 11(2):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 30338016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of shoe wearing time and midsole hardness on ground reaction forces, ankle stability and perceived comfort in basketball landing.
    Lam WK; Liu H; Wu GQ; Liu ZL; Sun W
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Oct; 37(20):2347-2355. PubMed ID: 31221050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimalist Running Shoes and Injury Risk Among United States Army Soldiers.
    Grier T; Canham-Chervak M; Bushman T; Anderson M; North W; Jones BH
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Jun; 44(6):1439-46. PubMed ID: 26951073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Effect of Shoes with Varying Mass on Vertical Ground Reaction Force Parameters in Short-Term Running.
    Keshvari B; Alevras S; Mitternacht J; Senner V
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2022; 15(1):191-205. PubMed ID: 36896120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Running shoes for preventing lower limb running injuries in adults.
    Relph N; Greaves H; Armstrong R; Prior TD; Spencer S; Griffiths IB; Dey P; Langley B
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Aug; 8(8):CD013368. PubMed ID: 35993829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Randomized Crossover Study Investigating the Running Economy of Highly-Trained Male and Female Distance Runners in Marathon Racing Shoes versus Track Spikes.
    Barnes KR; Kilding AE
    Sports Med; 2019 Feb; 49(2):331-342. PubMed ID: 30374945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rocker shoe, minimalist shoe, and standard running shoe: a comparison of running economy.
    Sobhani S; Bredeweg S; Dekker R; Kluitenberg B; van den Heuvel E; Hijmans J; Postema K
    J Sci Med Sport; 2014 May; 17(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 23711621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of shoe fitting in older people using three-dimensional foot scanning.
    Menz HB; Auhl M; Ristevski S; Frescos N; Munteanu SE
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2014 Jan; 7(1):3. PubMed ID: 24456656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association Between Running Shoe Characteristics and Lower Extremity Injuries in United States Military Academy Cadets.
    Helton GL; Cameron KL; Zifchock RA; Miller E; Goss DL; Song J; Neary MT
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 47(12):2853-2862. PubMed ID: 31498686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Altered Running Economy Directly Translates to Altered Distance-Running Performance.
    Hoogkamer W; Kipp S; Spiering BA; Kram R
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Nov; 48(11):2175-2180. PubMed ID: 27327023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acute physiological, biomechanical, and perceptual responses of runners wearing downward-curved carbon fiber insoles.
    Engel FA; Zehnter F; Yona T; Mai P; Willwacher S; Düking P; Sperlich B
    Front Sports Act Living; 2024; 6():1340154. PubMed ID: 38645727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in plantar loading based on shoe type and sex during a jump-landing task.
    Debiasio JC; Russell ME; Butler RJ; Nunley JA; Queen RM
    J Athl Train; 2013; 48(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 24067149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plantar pressure distribution and wearing characteristics of three forefoot offloading shoes in healthy adult subjects.
    Fuchs MCHW; Hermans MMN; Kars HJJ; Hendriks JGE; van der Steen MC
    Foot (Edinb); 2020 Dec; 45():101744. PubMed ID: 33010590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical-grade footwear: the impact of fit and comfort.
    Hurst B; Branthwaite H; Greenhalgh A; Chockalingam N
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():2. PubMed ID: 28070223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.