These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32149132)
1. Relationships of Stresses on Alveolar Bone and Abutment of Dental Implant from Various Bite Forces by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Kang X; Li Y; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Yu D; Peng Y Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7539628. PubMed ID: 32149132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone. Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models. Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influences of implant neck design and implant-abutment joint type on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1126-33. PubMed ID: 22920538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis. Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stress Distribution on Short Implants at Maxillary Posterior Alveolar Bone Model With Different Bone-to-Implant Contact Ratio: Finite Element Analysis. Yazicioglu D; Bayram B; Oguz Y; Cinar D; Uckan S J Oral Implantol; 2016 Feb; 42(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 26867093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Caglar A; Bal BT; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Ozkan S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress distribution around maxillary anterior implants as a factor of labial bone thickness and occlusal load angles: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Geramy A; Hassan-Ahangari A J Oral Implantol; 2014 Feb; 40(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 21787209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of different abutment diameter of implants on the peri-implant stress in the crestal bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis--In vitro study. Aradya A; Kumar UK; Chowdhary R Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 27054866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants. Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parafunctional loading and occlusal device on stress distribution around implants: A 3D finite element analysis. Borges Radaelli MT; Idogava HT; Spazzin AO; Noritomi PY; Boscato N J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):565-572. PubMed ID: 29724560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite Element Stress Analysis of Applied Forces to Implants and Supporting Tissues Using the "All-on-Four" Concept with Different Occlusal Schemes. Türker N; Büyükkaplan US; Sadowsky SJ; Özarslan MM J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 30515911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of occlusal inclination and loading on mandibular bone remodeling: a finite element study. Rungsiyakull C; Rungsiyakull P; Li Q; Li W; Swain M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):527-37. PubMed ID: 21691599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of platform and abutment angulation on peri-implant bone. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. Martini AP; Barros RM; Júnior AC; Rocha EP; de Almeida EO; Ferraz CC; Pellegrin MC; Anchieta RB J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):663-9. PubMed ID: 23110305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis. Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The dynamic natures of implant loading. Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Cinar D; Imirzalioglu P Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]