BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32150180)

  • 1. Nanoparticle rearrangement under stress in networks of cellulose nanofibrils using in situ SAXS during tensile testing.
    Engström J; Jimenez AM; Malmström E
    Nanoscale; 2020 Mar; 12(11):6462-6471. PubMed ID: 32150180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Highly Transparent and Toughened Poly(methyl methacrylate) Nanocomposite Films Containing Networks of Cellulose Nanofibrils.
    Dong H; Sliozberg YR; Snyder JF; Steele J; Chantawansri TL; Orlicki JA; Walck SD; Reiner RS; Rudie AW
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Nov; 7(45):25464-72. PubMed ID: 26513136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polycaprolactone Nanocomposites Reinforced with Cellulose Nanocrystals Surface-Modified via Covalent Grafting or Physisorption: A Comparative Study.
    Boujemaoui A; Cobo Sanchez C; Engström J; Bruce C; Fogelström L; Carlmark A; Malmström E
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2017 Oct; 9(40):35305-35318. PubMed ID: 28895728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nanostructural Effects in High Cellulose Content Thermoplastic Nanocomposites with a Covalently Grafted Cellulose-Poly(methyl methacrylate) Interface.
    Boujemaoui A; Ansari F; Berglund LA
    Biomacromolecules; 2019 Feb; 20(2):598-607. PubMed ID: 30047261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of thermal cycling on composites reinforced with two differently sized silica-glass fibers.
    Meriç G; Ruyter IE
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1157-63. PubMed ID: 17118440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preparation and characterization of transparent PMMA-cellulose-based nanocomposites.
    Kiziltas EE; Kiziltas A; Bollin SC; Gardner DJ
    Carbohydr Polym; 2015; 127():381-9. PubMed ID: 25965497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Xyloglucan-Functional Latex Particles via RAFT-Mediated Emulsion Polymerization for the Biomimetic Modification of Cellulose.
    Hatton FL; Ruda M; Lansalot M; D'Agosto F; Malmström E; Carlmark A
    Biomacromolecules; 2016 Apr; 17(4):1414-24. PubMed ID: 26913868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular restructuring at poly(n-butyl methacrylate) and poly(methyl methacrylate) surfaces due to compression by a sapphire prism studied by infrared-visible sum frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy.
    Kweskin SJ; Komvopoulos K; Somorjai GA
    Langmuir; 2005 Apr; 21(8):3647-52. PubMed ID: 15807615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optically Transparent and Toughened Poly(methyl methacrylate) Composite Films with Acylated Cellulose Nanofibers.
    Jamaluddin N; Hsu YI; Asoh TA; Uyama H
    ACS Omega; 2021 Apr; 6(16):10752-10758. PubMed ID: 34056229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transparent Poly(methyl methacrylate) Composites Based on Bacterial Cellulose Nanofiber Networks with Improved Fracture Resistance and Impact Strength.
    Santmarti A; Teh JW; Lee KY
    ACS Omega; 2019 Jun; 4(6):9896-9903. PubMed ID: 31460080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transparent and strong polymer nanocomposites generated from Pickering emulsion gels stabilized by cellulose nanofibrils.
    Liu X; Qi X; Guan Y; He Y; Li S; Liu H; Zhou L; Wei C; Yu C; Chen Y
    Carbohydr Polym; 2019 Nov; 224():115202. PubMed ID: 31472833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nano-dispersed cellulose nanofibrils-PMMA composite from pickering emulsion with tunable interfacial tensions.
    Kim DW; Shin J; Choi SQ
    Carbohydr Polym; 2020 Nov; 247():116762. PubMed ID: 32829874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved mechanical properties of polylactide nanocomposites-reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils through interfacial engineering via amine-functionalization.
    Lu Y; Cueva MC; Lara-Curzio E; Ozcan S
    Carbohydr Polym; 2015 Oct; 131():208-17. PubMed ID: 26256177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cationic polyacrylamide induced nanoparticles assembly in a cellulose nanofiber network.
    Raghuwanshi VS; Garusinghe UM; Raj P; Kirby N; Hoell A; Batchelor W; Garnier G
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2018 Nov; 529():180-186. PubMed ID: 29894936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface Charges Control the Structure and Properties of Layered Nanocomposite of Cellulose Nanofibrils and Clay Platelets.
    Xu D; Wang S; Berglund LA; Zhou Q
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2021 Jan; 13(3):4463-4472. PubMed ID: 33428385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Post-draw PAN-PMMA nanofiber reinforced and toughened Bis-GMA dental restorative composite.
    Sun W; Cai Q; Li P; Deng X; Wei Y; Xu M; Yang X
    Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 20579722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ductile all-cellulose nanocomposite films fabricated from core-shell structured cellulose nanofibrils.
    Larsson PA; Berglund LA; Wågberg L
    Biomacromolecules; 2014 Jun; 15(6):2218-23. PubMed ID: 24773125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thermoformable and transparent one-component nanocomposites based on surface grafted cellulose nanofiber.
    Chen S; Li D; Song F; Wang XL; Wang YZ
    Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Dec; 223(Pt A):213-222. PubMed ID: 36347373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cellulose nanocrystals vs. cellulose nanofibrils: a comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents.
    Xu X; Liu F; Jiang L; Zhu JY; Haagenson D; Wiesenborn DP
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2013 Apr; 5(8):2999-3009. PubMed ID: 23521616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-reinforced composite poly(methyl methacrylate): static and fatigue properties.
    Gilbert JL; Ney DS; Lautenschlager EP
    Biomaterials; 1995 Sep; 16(14):1043-55. PubMed ID: 8519925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.