418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32150329)
1. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of range uncertainty on clinical distributions of linear energy transfer and biological effectiveness in proton therapy.
Hahn C; Eulitz J; Peters N; Wohlfahrt P; Enghardt W; Richter C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6151-6162. PubMed ID: 33118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can differences in linear energy transfer and thus relative biological effectiveness compromise the dosimetric advantage of intensity-modulated proton therapy as compared to passively scattered proton therapy?
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald S; Paganetti H
Acta Oncol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 29726722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interlaced proton grid therapy - Linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness distributions.
Henry T; Ödén J
Phys Med; 2018 Dec; 56():81-89. PubMed ID: 30473384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The dirty and clean dose concept: Towards creating proton therapy treatment plans with a photon-like dose response.
Heuchel L; Hahn C; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):622-636. PubMed ID: 37877574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.
Hahn C; Heuchel L; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Plaude S; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 36273132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Liu W; Schild SE; Chang JY; Liao Z; Chang YH; Wen Z; Shen J; Stoker JB; Ding X; Hu Y; Sahoo N; Herman MG; Vargas C; Keole S; Wong W; Bues M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):523-533. PubMed ID: 26725727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.
An Y; Shan J; Patel SH; Wong W; Schild SE; Ding X; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6138-6147. PubMed ID: 28976574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proton monoenergetic arc therapy (PMAT) to enhance LETd within the target.
Bertolet A; Carabe A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 65(16):165006. PubMed ID: 32428896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can We Advance Proton Therapy for Prostate? Considering Alternative Beam Angles and Relative Biological Effectiveness Variations When Comparing Against Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
Underwood T; Giantsoudi D; Moteabbed M; Zietman A; Efstathiou J; Paganetti H; Lu HM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):454-464. PubMed ID: 27084660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inclusion of a variable RBE into proton and photon plan comparison for various fractionation schedules in prostate radiation therapy.
Ödén J; Eriksson K; Toma-Dasu I
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):810-822. PubMed ID: 28107554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reformulated McNamara RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Gu W; Ruan D; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2136-2149. PubMed ID: 35181892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variable RBE in proton therapy: comparison of different model predictions and their influence on clinical-like scenarios.
Giovannini G; Böhlen T; Cabal G; Bauer J; Tessonnier T; Frey K; Debus J; Mairani A; Parodi K
Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():68. PubMed ID: 27185038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers.
Liu W; Mohan R; Park P; Liu Z; Li H; Li X; Li Y; Wu R; Sahoo N; Dong L; Zhu XR; Grosshans DR
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(6):384-91. PubMed ID: 25407859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
