These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32151207)

  • 1. Measuring unconditional stimulus expectancy during evaluative conditioning strengthens explicit conditional stimulus valence.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Sep; 34(6):1210-1225. PubMed ID: 32151207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relapse of evaluative learning-Evidence for reinstatement, renewal, but not spontaneous recovery, of extinguished evaluative learning in a picture-picture evaluative conditioning paradigm.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1178-1206. PubMed ID: 31750717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of cross unconditional stimulus reinstatement on electrodermal responding and conditional stimulus valence in differential fear conditioning.
    Luck CC; Patterson RR; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14278. PubMed ID: 36929597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of instructions on generalised valence - conditional stimulus instructions after evaluative conditioning update the explicit and implicit evaluations of generalisation stimuli.
    Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):666-682. PubMed ID: 36967641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shaking that icky feeling: effects of extinction and counterconditioning on disgust-related evaluative learning.
    Engelhard IM; Leer A; Lange E; Olatunji BO
    Behav Ther; 2014 Sep; 45(5):708-19. PubMed ID: 25022781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the devil in the detail? Evidence for S-S learning after unconditional stimulus revaluation in human evaluative conditioning under a broader set of experimental conditions.
    Jensen-Fielding H; Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Sep; 32(6):1275-1290. PubMed ID: 29183247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How disappointing: Startle modulation reveals conditional stimuli presented after pleasant unconditional stimuli acquire negative valence.
    Green LJS; Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Aug; 57(8):e13563. PubMed ID: 32167177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Verbal instructions targeting valence alter negative conditional stimulus evaluations (but do not affect reinstatement rates).
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Feb; 32(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28141482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Startle modulation and explicit valence evaluations dissociate during backward fear conditioning.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2017 May; 54(5):673-683. PubMed ID: 28169435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Be careful what you say! - Evaluative change based on instructional learning generalizes to other similar stimuli and to the wider category.
    Luck CC; Patterson RR; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Feb; 35(1):169-184. PubMed ID: 32907472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of instructions on reversing the generalization of valence, US expectancy, and electrodermal responding in fear conditioning.
    Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
    Psychophysiology; 2024 Jan; 61(1):e14429. PubMed ID: 37661638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What you see is what will change: evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence.
    Gast A; Rothermund K
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Jan; 25(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 21432657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Startle during backward evaluative conditioning is not modulated by instructions.
    Green LJS; Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13679. PubMed ID: 32870509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expectancy-learning and evaluative learning in human classical conditioning: affective priming as an indirect and unobtrusive measure of conditioned stimulus valence.
    Hermans D; Vansteenwegen D; Crombez G; Baeyens F; Eelen P
    Behav Res Ther; 2002 Mar; 40(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 11863234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-extinction conditional stimulus valence predicts reinstatement fear: relevance for long-term outcomes of exposure therapy.
    Zbozinek TD; Hermans D; Prenoveau JM; Liao B; Craske MG
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(4):654-67. PubMed ID: 24957680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluative conditioning affects the subsequent acquisition of differential fear conditioning as indexed by electrodermal responding and stimulus evaluations.
    Lipp OV; Luck CC; Muir AC
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13505. PubMed ID: 31736088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Extinction of likes and dislikes: effects of feature-specific attention allocation.
    Vanaelst J; Spruyt A; Everaert T; De Houwer J
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Dec; 31(8):1595-1609. PubMed ID: 27838952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is evaluative conditioning really resistant to extinction? Evidence for changes in evaluative judgements without changes in evaluative representations.
    Gawronski B; Gast A; De Houwer J
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(5):816-30. PubMed ID: 25131515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simultaneous conditioning of valence and arousal.
    Gawronski B; Mitchell DG
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(4):577-95. PubMed ID: 24116885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A memory-based judgment account of expectancy-liking dissociations in evaluative conditioning.
    Aust F; Haaf JM; Stahl C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):417-439. PubMed ID: 30024247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.