253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32151255)
21. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dosimetric impact of applying a model-based dose calculation algorithm for skin cancer brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy).
Placidi E; Fionda B; Rosa E; Lancellotta V; Napolitano A; Angeli M; Pastore F; Gambacorta MA; Indovina L; Tagliaferri L; Spirito M
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2023 Dec; 15(6):448-452. PubMed ID: 38230401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dosimetric analysis of breast cancer tumor bed boost: An interstitial brachytherapy vs. external beam radiation therapy comparison for deeply seated tumors.
Shahbazian H; Bakhshali R; Shamsi A; Bagheri A
Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(2):264-274. PubMed ID: 31787575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Toward automated and personalized organ dose determination in CT examinations - A comparison of two tissue characterization models for Monte Carlo organ dose calculation with a Therapy Planning System.
Källman HE; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 30582891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comprehensive dosimetric study on switching from a Type-B to a Type-C dose algorithm for modern lung SBRT.
Zhou C; Bennion N; Ma R; Liang X; Wang S; Zvolanek K; Hyun M; Li X; Zhou S; Zhen W; Lin C; Wahl A; Zheng D
Radiat Oncol; 2017 May; 12(1):80. PubMed ID: 28476138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of TG-43 and Monte Carlo calculations in
Peppa V; Pappas EP; Karaiskos P; Major T; Polgár C; Papagiannis P
Phys Med; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 27720277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Investigation of dosimetric variations of liver radiotherapy using deformable registration of planning CT and cone-beam CT.
Huang P; Yu G; Chen J; Ma C; Qin S; Yin Y; Liang Y; Li H; Li D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 28291931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quantifying the effect of seed orientation in postplanning dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Collins Fekete CA; Plamondon M; Martin AG; Vigneault É; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101704. PubMed ID: 25281943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comprehensive evaluation of adaptive daily planning for cervical cancer HDR brachytherapy.
Meerschaert R; Nalichowski A; Burmeister J; Paul A; Miller S; Hu Z; Zhuang L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):323-333. PubMed ID: 27929505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of offline adaptive planning techniques in image-guided brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Liu H; Kinard J; Maurer J; Shang Q; Vanderstraeten C; Hayes L; Sintay B; Wiant D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):316-322. PubMed ID: 30284370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. BrachyGuide: a brachytherapy-dedicated DICOM RT viewer and interface to Monte Carlo simulation software.
Pantelis E; Peppa V; Lahanas V; Pappas E; Papagiannis P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5136. PubMed ID: 25679171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Monte Carlo investigation of I-125 interseed attenuation for standard and thinner seeds in prostate brachytherapy with phantom validation using a MOSFET.
Mason J; Al-Qaisieh B; Bownes P; Henry A; Thwaites D
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031717. PubMed ID: 23464312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of Dose Distributions With TG-43 and Collapsed Cone Convolution Algorithms Applied to Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Patient Plans.
Thrower SL; Shaitelman SF; Bloom E; Salehpour M; Gifford K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Aug; 95(5):1520-1526. PubMed ID: 27315666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Internal target volume definition using four-dimensional CT and dosimetric evaluation for hepatocellular carcinoma].
Xi M; Liu MZ; Deng XW; Liu H; Huang XY; Zhang L; Li QQ; Hu YH; Cai L; Cui NJ
Ai Zheng; 2007 Jan; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17222359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A generic TG-186 shielded applicator for commissioning model-based dose calculation algorithms for high-dose-rate
Ma Y; Vijande J; Ballester F; Tedgren ÅC; Granero D; Haworth A; Mourtada F; Fonseca GP; Zourari K; Papagiannis P; Rivard MJ; Siebert FA; Sloboda RS; Smith R; Chamberland MJP; Thomson RM; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5961-5976. PubMed ID: 28722180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A retrospective dosimetric comparison of TG43 and a commercially available MBDCA for an APBI brachytherapy patient cohort.
Zourari K; Major T; Herein A; Peppa V; Polgár C; Papagiannis P
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):669-76. PubMed ID: 26055951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Dosimetric analysis of different optimization algorithms for three-dimensional brachytherapy for gynecologic tumors].
Ling B; Chen L; Zhang J; Cao X; Ye W; Ouyang Y; Chi F; Ding Z
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2024 Apr; 44(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 38708512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Deformable image registration-based contour propagation yields clinically acceptable plans for MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy planning.
Chapman CH; Polan D; Vineberg K; Jolly S; Maturen KE; Brock KK; Prisciandaro JI
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):360-367. PubMed ID: 29331573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of the MIM Symphony treatment planning system for low-dose-rate- prostate brachytherapy.
Dhanesar SK; Lim TY; Du W; Bruno TL; Frank SJ; Kudchadker RJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):62–75. PubMed ID: 26699290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetry modeling for focal high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Mason J; Al-Qaisieh B; Bownes P; Thwaites D; Henry A
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):611-7. PubMed ID: 25085456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
