These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions. Taha D; Sabet A J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microstructural and Mechanical Characterization of CAD/CAM Materials for Monolithic Dental Restorations. Furtado de Mendonca A; Shahmoradi M; Gouvêa CVD; De Souza GM; Ellakwa A J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e587-e594. PubMed ID: 30121945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of cingulum rest seats in CAD-CAM tooth-colored crowns for removable partial denture abutments. Manchester JA; Chung KH; Brudvik JS; Ramos V; Chen YW J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):828-835. PubMed ID: 30598310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monitoring fatigue damage in different CAD/CAM materials: A new approach with optical coherence tomography. Schlenz MA; Skroch M; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Feb; 65(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 32938871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator. Bankoğlu Güngör M; Karakoca Nemli S J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar; 119(3):473-480. PubMed ID: 28645670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro analysis of the fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns with different occlusal thickness. Sorrentino R; Triulzio C; Tricarico MG; Bonadeo G; Gherlone EF; Ferrari M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():328-333. PubMed ID: 27104931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns. Kale E; Seker E; Yilmaz B; Özcelik TB J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology. Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems. Hamza TA; Sherif RM J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultra-thin occlusal veneers bonded to enamel and made of ceramic or hybrid materials exhibit load-bearing capacities not different from conventional restorations. Ioannidis A; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Benic GI J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Feb; 90():433-440. PubMed ID: 30447557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]