144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32151914)
1. End-to-end semantic segmentation of personalized deep brain structures for non-invasive brain stimulation.
Rashed EA; Gomez-Tames J; Hirata A
Neural Netw; 2020 May; 125():233-244. PubMed ID: 32151914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of segmentation accuracy in structural MR head scans on electric field computation for TMS and tES.
Rashed EA; Gomez-Tames J; Hirata A
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):064002. PubMed ID: 33524957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of deep brain structure modeling on transcranial direct current stimulation-induced electric fields: An in-silico study.
Song CB; Lim C; Lee J; Kim D; Seo H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38082988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial and polarity precision of concentric high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Alam M; Truong DQ; Khadka N; Bikson M
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(12):4506-21. PubMed ID: 27223853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significant group-level hotspots found in deep brain regions during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A computational analysis of electric fields.
Gomez-Tames J; Asai A; Hirata A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Mar; 131(3):755-765. PubMed ID: 31839398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current Density Imaging During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using DT-MRI and MREIT: Algorithm Development and Numerical Simulations.
Kwon OI; Sajib SZ; Sersa I; Oh TI; Jeong WC; Kim HJ; Woo EJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jan; 63(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 26111387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation?
Antonenko D; Thielscher A; Saturnino GB; Aydin S; Ittermann B; Grittner U; Flöel A
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(5):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 30930209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art.
Nielsen JD; Madsen KH; Puonti O; Siebner HR; Bauer C; Madsen CG; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():587-598. PubMed ID: 29518567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of accurate human head models for personalized electromagnetic dosimetry using deep learning.
Rashed EA; Gomez-Tames J; Hirata A
Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116132. PubMed ID: 31472248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accurate and robust whole-head segmentation from magnetic resonance images for individualized head modeling.
Puonti O; Van Leemput K; Saturnino GB; Siebner HR; Madsen KH; Thielscher A
Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117044. PubMed ID: 32534963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How structural and functional MRI can inform dual-site tACS parameters: A case study in a clinical population and its pragmatic implications.
Soleimani G; Kupliki R; Bodurka J; Paulus MP; Ekhtiari H
Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 35042056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real-time estimation of electric fields induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation with deep neural networks.
Yokota T; Maki T; Nagata T; Murakami T; Ugawa Y; Laakso I; Hirata A; Hontani H
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(6):1500-1507. PubMed ID: 31262697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields.
Mikkonen M; Laakso I; Tanaka S; Hirata A
Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31606449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of electric field modeling pipelines for transcranial direct current stimulation.
Bhalerao GV; Sreeraj VS; Bose A; Narayanaswamy JC; Venkatasubramanian G
Neurophysiol Clin; 2021 Aug; 51(4):303-318. PubMed ID: 34023189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Woods AJ; Bryant V; Sacchetti D; Gervits F; Hamilton R
Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(3):515-9. PubMed ID: 25583653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design of NIRS Probe Based on Computational Model to Find Out the Optimal Location for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation.
Sharma G; Roy Chowdhury S
J Med Syst; 2018 Oct; 42(12):244. PubMed ID: 30374669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study.
Laakso I; Tanaka S; Mikkonen M; Koyama S; Sadato N; Hirata A
Neuroimage; 2016 Aug; 137():140-151. PubMed ID: 27188218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in semantic dementia: a double blind, sham controlled, randomized clinical trial.
Sanches C; Levy R; Benisty S; Volpe-Gillot L; Habert MO; Kas A; Ströer S; Pyatigorskaya N; Kaglik A; Bourbon A; Dubois B; Migliaccio R; Valero-Cabré A; Teichmann M
Trials; 2019 Nov; 20(1):632. PubMed ID: 31747967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Left prefrontal neuronavigated electrode localization in tDCS: 10-20 EEG system versus MRI-guided neuronavigation.
De Witte S; Klooster D; Dedoncker J; Duprat R; Remue J; Baeken C
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging; 2018 Apr; 274():1-6. PubMed ID: 29429773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-response in modulating brain function with transcranial direct current stimulation: From local to network levels.
Soleimani G; Kupliki R; Paulus M; Ekhtiari H
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Oct; 19(10):e1011572. PubMed ID: 37883583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
