These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32152045)

  • 1. Toward an Evolutionarily Appropriate Null Model: Jointly Inferring Demography and Purifying Selection.
    Johri P; Charlesworth B; Jensen JD
    Genetics; 2020 May; 215(1):173-192. PubMed ID: 32152045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing an Evolutionary Baseline Model for Humans: Jointly Inferring Purifying Selection with Population History.
    Johri P; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 37128989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Purifying and Background Selection on the Inference of Population History: Problems and Prospects.
    Johri P; Riall K; Becher H; Excoffier L; Charlesworth B; Jensen JD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Jun; 38(7):2986-3003. PubMed ID: 33591322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing an evolutionary baseline model for humans: jointly inferring purifying selection with population history.
    Johri P; Pfeifer SP; Jensen JD
    bioRxiv; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37090533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human demographic history has amplified the effects of background selection across the genome.
    Torres R; Szpiech ZA; Hernandez RD
    PLoS Genet; 2018 Jun; 14(6):e1007387. PubMed ID: 29912945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An approximate bayesian estimator suggests strong, recurrent selective sweeps in Drosophila.
    Jensen JD; Thornton KR; Andolfatto P
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000198. PubMed ID: 18802463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biases in ARG-Based Inference of Historical Population Size in Populations Experiencing Selection.
    Marsh JI; Johri P
    Mol Biol Evol; 2024 Jul; 41(7):. PubMed ID: 38874402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex differences in deleterious mutational effects in Drosophila melanogaster: combining quantitative and population genetic insights.
    Ruzicka F; Connallon T; Reuter M
    Genetics; 2021 Nov; 219(3):. PubMed ID: 34740242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Genomic Map of the Effects of Linked Selection in Drosophila.
    Elyashiv E; Sattath S; Hu TT; Strutsovsky A; McVicker G; Andolfatto P; Coop G; Sella G
    PLoS Genet; 2016 Aug; 12(8):e1006130. PubMed ID: 27536991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential Effect of Selection against LINE Retrotransposons among Vertebrates Inferred from Whole-Genome Data and Demographic Modeling.
    Xue AT; Ruggiero RP; Hickerson MJ; Boissinot S
    Genome Biol Evol; 2018 Apr; 10(5):1265-1281. PubMed ID: 29688421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential strengths of positive selection revealed by hitchhiking effects at small physical scales in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lee YC; Langley CH; Begun DJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):804-16. PubMed ID: 24361994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Background selection as baseline for nucleotide variation across the Drosophila genome.
    Comeron JM
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Jun; 10(6):e1004434. PubMed ID: 24968283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferring Demography and Selection in Organisms Characterized by Skewed Offspring Distributions.
    Sackman AM; Harris RB; Jensen JD
    Genetics; 2019 Mar; 211(3):1019-1028. PubMed ID: 30651284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.
    Haudry A; Laurent S; Kapun M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():357-396. PubMed ID: 31975175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular evolution under increasing transposable element burden in Drosophila: a speed limit on the evolutionary arms race.
    Castillo DM; Mell JC; Box KS; Blumenstiel JP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 11():258. PubMed ID: 21917173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Heterogeneity in effective size across the genome: effects on the inverse instantaneous coalescence rate (IICR) and implications for demographic inference under linked selection.
    Boitard S; Arredondo A; Chikhi L; Mazet O
    Genetics; 2022 Mar; 220(3):. PubMed ID: 35100421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Broad-scale variation in human genetic diversity levels is predicted by purifying selection on coding and non-coding elements.
    Murphy DA; Elyashiv E; Amster G; Sella G
    Elife; 2023 Jun; 12():. PubMed ID: 36196994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.
    Campos JL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):287-303. PubMed ID: 30923166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the contributions of purifying selection and progeny-skew in dictating within-host Mycobacterium tuberculosis evolution.
    Morales-Arce AY; Harris RB; Stone AC; Jensen JD
    Evolution; 2020 May; 74(5):992-1001. PubMed ID: 32233086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shifts in the intensity of purifying selection: an analysis of genome-wide polymorphism data from two closely related yeast species.
    Elyashiv E; Bullaughey K; Sattath S; Rinott Y; Przeworski M; Sella G
    Genome Res; 2010 Nov; 20(11):1558-73. PubMed ID: 20817943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.