118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32152646)
21. In vitro evaluation of the mucin-adhesion ability and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1.
Valeriano VD; Parungao-Balolong MM; Kang DK
J Appl Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 117(2):485-97. PubMed ID: 24807045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Indigenous dadih lactic acid bacteria: cell-surface properties and interactions with pathogens.
Collado MC; Surono I; Meriluoto J; Salminen S
J Food Sci; 2007 Apr; 72(3):M89-93. PubMed ID: 17995806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Biofilm formation by antagonistic strains of oral Lactobacillus].
Chervinets VM; Chervinets IuV; Samoukina AM; Mikhaĭlova ES; Gavrilova OA
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2012; 91(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 22678601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Selected Lactobacillus strains isolated from sugary and milk kefir reduce Salmonella infection of epithelial cells in vitro.
Zavala L; Golowczyc MA; van Hoorde K; Medrano M; Huys G; Vandamme P; Abraham AG
Benef Microbes; 2016 Sep; 7(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 27291404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of probiotic adhesion and inhibitory effect on Escherichia coli and Salmonella adhesion.
Wang Y; Jia D; Wang JH; Li HH; Liu JL; Liu AH; Wang JM; Guan GQ; Luo JX; Yin H; Li YQ
Arch Microbiol; 2021 Dec; 203(10):6267-6274. PubMed ID: 34581832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Competition for adhesion between probiotics and human gastrointestinal pathogens in the presence of carbohydrate.
Lee YK; Puong KY
Br J Nutr; 2002 Sep; 88 Suppl 1():S101-8. PubMed ID: 12215184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from the feces of breast-fed infants and Taiwanese pickled cabbage.
Wang CY; Lin PR; Ng CC; Shyu YT
Anaerobe; 2010 Dec; 16(6):578-85. PubMed ID: 20951815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Binding activity to intestinal cells and transient colonization in mice of two Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei strains with high aggregation potential.
Miljkovic M; Thomas M; Serror P; Rigottier-Gois L; Kojic M
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 May; 35(6):85. PubMed ID: 31134456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Probiotic Characterization of Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei KNI9 Inhibiting Adherence of Yersinia enterocolitica on Caco-2 Cells In Vitro.
Damodharan K; Palaniyandi SA; Suh JW; Yang SH
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2020 Jun; 12(2):600-607. PubMed ID: 31289994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of food models and low-temperature storage on the adhesion of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG to Caco-2 cells.
Deepika G; Rastall RA; Charalampopoulos D
J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Aug; 59(16):8661-6. PubMed ID: 21756003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Inhibition of Escherichia coli adhesion to human intestinal Caco-2 cells by probiotic candidate Lactobacillus plantarum strain L15.
Alizadeh Behbahani B; Noshad M; Falah F
Microb Pathog; 2019 Nov; 136():103677. PubMed ID: 31437574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. S-layer protein 2 of Lactobacillus crispatus 2029, its structural and immunomodulatory characteristics and roles in protective potential of the whole bacteria against foodborne pathogens.
Abramov VM; Kosarev IV; Priputnevich TV; Machulin AV; Khlebnikov VS; Pchelintsev SY; Vasilenko RN; Sakulin VK; Suzina NE; Chikileva IO; Derysheva EI; Melnikov VG; Nikonov IN; Samoilenko VA; Svetoch EE; Sukhikh GT; Uversky VN; Karlyshev AV
Int J Biol Macromol; 2020 May; 150():400-412. PubMed ID: 32045605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Adaptation and Probiotic Potential of Lactobacilli, Isolated from the Oral Cavity and Intestines of Healthy People.
Chervinets Y; Chervinets V; Shenderov B; Belyaeva E; Troshin A; Lebedev S; Danilenko V
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2018 Mar; 10(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 29164486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 2648 is a potential probiotic that enhances intestinal barrier function.
Anderson RC; Cookson AL; McNabb WC; Kelly WJ; Roy NC
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2010 Aug; 309(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 20618863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Probiotic Properties of Lactobacilli and Their Ability to Inhibit the Adhesion of Enteropathogenic Bacteria to Caco-2 and HT-29 Cells.
Fonseca HC; de Sousa Melo D; Ramos CL; Dias DR; Schwan RF
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2021 Feb; 13(1):102-112. PubMed ID: 32415515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Exopolysaccharides Produced by
Konieczna C; Słodziński M; Schmidt MT
Pol J Microbiol; 2018; 67(3):273-281. PubMed ID: 30451443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of Potential Probiotic Lactobacillus Strains on Host Growth and Development in a Drosophila melanogaster Model.
Laomongkholchaisri P; Teanpaisan R; Wonglapsuwan M; Piwat S
Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2021 Apr; 13(2):390-397. PubMed ID: 32875521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Displacement of bacterial pathogens from mucus and Caco-2 cell surface by lactobacilli.
Lee YK; Puong KY; Ouwehand AC; Salminen S
J Med Microbiol; 2003 Oct; 52(Pt 10):925-930. PubMed ID: 12972590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment and comparison of probiotic potential of four Lactobacillus species isolated from feces samples of Iranian infants.
Halimi S; Mirsalehian A
Microbiol Immunol; 2016 Feb; 60(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 26648174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Physiological Changes of Surface Membrane in Lactobacillus with Prebiotics.
Pan M; Kumaree KK; Shah NP
J Food Sci; 2017 Mar; 82(3):744-750. PubMed ID: 28199749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
