These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32154833)

  • 1. Unified methods for feature selection in large-scale genomic studies with censored survival outcomes.
    Spirko-Burns L; Devarajan K
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(11):3409-3417. PubMed ID: 32154833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pseudo-R2 measure for selecting genomic markers with crossing hazards functions.
    Rouam S; Moreau T; Broët P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Mar; 11():28. PubMed ID: 21401964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supervised Dimension Reduction for Large-Scale "Omics" Data With Censored Survival Outcomes Under Possible Non-Proportional Hazards.
    Spirko-Burns L; Devarajan K
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2021; 18(5):2032-2044. PubMed ID: 31940547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling gene-wise dependencies improves the identification of drug response biomarkers in cancer studies.
    Nikolova O; Moser R; Kemp C; Gönen M; Margolin AA
    Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(9):1362-1369. PubMed ID: 28082455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NCC-AUC: an AUC optimization method to identify multi-biomarker panel for cancer prognosis from genomic and clinical data.
    Zou M; Liu Z; Zhang XS; Wang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(20):3330-8. PubMed ID: 26092859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying common prognostic factors in genomic cancer studies: a novel index for censored outcomes.
    Rouam S; Moreau T; Broët P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 11():150. PubMed ID: 20334636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gene selection in microarray survival studies under possibly non-proportional hazards.
    Dunkler D; Schemper M; Heinze G
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 26(6):784-90. PubMed ID: 20118118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of hierarchical models for integrative genomic analyses.
    Denis M; Tadesse MG
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 26545823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The spike-and-slab lasso Cox model for survival prediction and associated genes detection.
    Tang Z; Shen Y; Zhang X; Yi N
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(18):2799-2807. PubMed ID: 28472220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deviance residuals-based sparse PLS and sparse kernel PLS regression for censored data.
    Bastien P; Bertrand F; Meyer N; Maumy-Bertrand M
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 31(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 25286920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Penalized estimation of a class of single-index varying-coefficient models for integrative genomic analysis.
    Ng HM; Jiang B; Wong KY
    Biom J; 2023 Jan; 65(1):e2100139. PubMed ID: 35837982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential feature selection and inference using multi-variate random forests.
    Mayer J; Rahman R; Ghosh S; Pal R
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 34(8):1336-1344. PubMed ID: 29267851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved survival analysis by learning shared genomic information from pan-cancer data.
    Kim S; Kim K; Choe J; Lee I; Kang J
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(Suppl_1):i389-i398. PubMed ID: 32657401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate and efficient estimation of small P-values with the cross-entropy method: applications in genomic data analysis.
    Shi Y; Wang M; Shi W; Lee JH; Kang H; Jiang H
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 35(14):2441-2448. PubMed ID: 30521030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. seqlm: an MDL based method for identifying differentially methylated regions in high density methylation array data.
    Kolde R; Märtens K; Lokk K; Laur S; Vilo J
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):2604-10. PubMed ID: 27187204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. M3Drop: dropout-based feature selection for scRNASeq.
    Andrews TS; Hemberg M
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Aug; 35(16):2865-2867. PubMed ID: 30590489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bayesian variable selection for the analysis of microarray data with censored outcomes.
    Sha N; Tadesse MG; Vannucci M
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2262-8. PubMed ID: 16845144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A pairwise strategy for imputing predictive features when combining multiple datasets.
    Wu Y; Ren B; Patil P
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36576001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overcoming the inadaptability of sparse group lasso for data with various group structures by stacking.
    He H; Guo X; Yu J; Ai C; Shi S
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Mar; 38(6):1542-1549. PubMed ID: 34908103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.