147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32155202)
1. Amsler grid test for detection of advanced glaucoma in Ethiopia.
Gessesse GW; Tamrat L; Damji KF
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230017. PubMed ID: 32155202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of the Amsler Grid Test in Evaluating Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.
Su D; Greenberg A; Simonson JL; Teng CC; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Park SC
Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 26783097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of patient perception of glaucomatous visual field loss and its association with disease severity using Amsler grid.
Fujitani K; Su D; Ghassibi MP; Simonson JL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Park SC
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184230. PubMed ID: 28949971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amsler Grid Versus 10-2 Test in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Gbadegesin TM; Olawoye O; Sarimiye TF; Idowu OO; Ajayi BGK
J West Afr Coll Surg; 2023; 13(2):92-99. PubMed ID: 37228887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Entoptic perimetry screening for central diabetic scotomas and macular edema.
Brown JC; Kylstra JA; Mah ML
Ophthalmology; 2000 Apr; 107(4):755-9. PubMed ID: 10768339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early detection of glaucoma by means of a novel 3D computer-automated visual field test.
Nazemi PP; Fink W; Sadun AA; Francis B; Minckler D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1331-6. PubMed ID: 17504855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversal of Glaucoma Hemifield Test Results and Visual Field Features in Glaucoma.
Wang M; Pasquale LR; Shen LQ; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Silva RNE; Bex PJ; Elze T
Ophthalmology; 2018 Mar; 125(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 29103791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinguishing wet from dry age-related macular degeneration using three-dimensional computer-automated threshold Amsler grid testing.
Robison CD; Jivrajka RV; Bababeygy SR; Fink W; Sadun AA; Sebag J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Oct; 95(10):1419-23. PubMed ID: 21270434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Caronia Glaucoma Card Versus Amsler Grid for Monitoring Patients With Advanced Glaucoma.
Caronia RM
J Glaucoma; 2024 Apr; 33(4):277-287. PubMed ID: 38031281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Clues to Predict the Presence of Parafoveal Scotoma on Humphrey 10-2 Visual Field Using a Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field.
Park HY; Hwang BE; Shin HY; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 161():150-9. PubMed ID: 26476213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The TsiogkaSpaeth grid for detection of neurological visual field defects: a validation study.
Tsiogka A; Moster ML; Chatzistefanou KI; Karmiris E; Samoli E; Giachos I; Droutsas K; Papaconstantinou D; Spaeth GL
Neurol Sci; 2024 Jun; 45(6):2869-2875. PubMed ID: 38191765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of a multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the preferential hyperacuity perimeter for detection of age-related macular degeneration.
Goldstein M; Loewenstein A; Barak A; Pollack A; Bukelman A; Katz H; Springer A; Schachat AP; Bressler NM; Bressler SB; Cooney MJ; Alster Y; Rafaeli O; Malach R;
Retina; 2005; 25(3):296-303. PubMed ID: 15805906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss.
Crabb DP; Smith ND; Glen FC; Burton R; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23415421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of new-onset choroidal neovascularization using optical coherence tomography: the AMD DOC Study.
Do DV; Gower EW; Cassard SD; Boyer D; Bressler NM; Bressler SB; Heier JS; Jefferys JL; Singerman LJ; Solomon SD
Ophthalmology; 2012 Apr; 119(4):771-8. PubMed ID: 22297028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Replacing the Amsler grid: a new method for monitoring patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Loewenstein A; Malach R; Goldstein M; Leibovitch I; Barak A; Baruch E; Alster Y; Rafaeli O; Avni I; Yassur Y
Ophthalmology; 2003 May; 110(5):966-70. PubMed ID: 12750099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional computer-automated threshold Amsler grid test.
Fink W; Sadun AA
J Biomed Opt; 2004; 9(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 14715067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Faster algorithms to measure visual field using the variational Bayes linear regression model in glaucoma: comparison with SITA-Fast.
Hirasawa K; Murata H; Shimada S; Matsuno M; Shoji N; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2023 Jul; 107(7):946-952. PubMed ID: 35232725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An objective evaluation of gaze tracking in Humphrey perimetry and the relation with the reproducibility of visual fields: a pilot study in glaucoma.
Ishiyama Y; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Nov; 55(12):8149-52. PubMed ID: 25389198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
