147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32155202)
21. [Comparison of Preferential Hyperacuity Perimeter (PHP) test and Amsler grid test in the diagnosis of different stages of age-related macular degeneration].
Kampmeier J; Zorn MM; Lang GK; Botros YT; Lang GE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Sep; 223(9):752-6. PubMed ID: 16986086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validity and interpretation of Amsler grid reports.
Schuchard RA
Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 111(6):776-80. PubMed ID: 8512478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Amsler Grid Test for Detecting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Bjerager J; Schneider M; Potapenko I; van Dijk EHC; Faber C; Grauslund J; Pfau K; Huemer J; Muttuvelu DV; Rasmussen MLR; Sabaner MC; Subhi Y
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 141(4):315-323. PubMed ID: 36795396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice.
Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A; Aspinall P; Taguri A; King AJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Mar; 133(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 11860968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Utility of CLOCK CHART binocular edition for self-checking the binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma.
Ishibashi M; Matsumoto C; Hashimoto S; Eura M; Okuyama S; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Kayazawa T; Numata T; Kusaka S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 103(11):1672-1676. PubMed ID: 30636206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of frequency-doubling technology perimetry in a population-based prevalence survey of glaucoma: the Tajimi study.
Iwase A; Tomidokoro A; Araie M; Shirato S; Shimizu H; Kitazawa Y;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17070580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms.
Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Sep; 120(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 12215086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Parafoveal scotoma progression in glaucoma: humphrey 10-2 versus 24-2 visual field analysis.
Park SC; Kung Y; Su D; Simonson JL; Furlanetto RL; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2013 Aug; 120(8):1546-50. PubMed ID: 23697959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of measuring the central field with the Berkeley field test.
Mishra SK; Shrestha GS; Korani H
Nepal J Ophthalmol; 2014; 6(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 25680247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A new index to monitor central visual field progression in glaucoma.
de Moraes CG; Furlanetto RL; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1531-8. PubMed ID: 24726202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Central and Peripheral Visual Field Concordance in Glaucoma.
Odden JL; Mihailovic A; Boland MV; Friedman DS; West SK; Ramulu PY
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 May; 57(6):2797-804. PubMed ID: 27214688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Role of visual field reliability indices in ruling out glaucoma.
Rao HL; Yadav RK; Begum VU; Addepalli UK; Choudhari NS; Senthil S; Garudadri CS
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 133(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 25256758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the original Amsler grid with the preferential hyperacuity perimeter for detecting choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.
Isaac DL; Avila MP; Cialdini AP
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(5):771-6. PubMed ID: 18157300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Sampling the Visual Field Based on Individual Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Profile.
Ballae Ganeshrao S; Turpin A; McKendrick AM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 59(2):1066-1074. PubMed ID: 29490343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does eye examination order for standard automated perimetry matter?
Kelly SR; Bryan SR; Crabb DP
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 97(6):e833-e838. PubMed ID: 30801992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Novel 3D computer-automated threshold Amsler grid visual field testing of scotomas in patients with glaucoma.
Nguyen DT; Fahimi A; Fink W; Nazemi PP; Kim JK; Sadun AA
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):776-82. PubMed ID: 19787597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Montesano G; Bryan SR; Crabb DP; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Lanzetta P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Garway-Heath DF; Brusini P; Rossetti LM
Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Flicker defined form perimetry in glaucoma suspects with normal achromatic visual fields.
Reznicek L; Lamparter J; Vogel M; Kampik A; Hirneiß C
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Jul; 40(7):683-9. PubMed ID: 25207744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
