147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32155202)
41. Effect of focal lamina cribrosa defect on glaucomatous visual field progression.
Faridi OS; Park SC; Kabadi R; Su D; De Moraes CG; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Ophthalmology; 2014 Aug; 121(8):1524-30. PubMed ID: 24697910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Threshold Amsler grid testing. Cross-polarizing lenses enhance yield.
Wall M; Sadun AA
Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Apr; 104(4):520-3. PubMed ID: 3954654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.
Kulkarni SV; Coupland SG; Stitt DM; Hamilton J; Brownstein JJ; Damji KF
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):406-12. PubMed ID: 24093188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Distribution and Progression of Visual Field Defects With Binocular Vision in Glaucoma.
Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Eura M; Okuyama S; Nomoto H; Tanabe F; Kayazawa T; Iwase A; Shimomura Y
J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):519-524. PubMed ID: 29557827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
Bengtsson B
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Threshold Amsler grid testing in maculopathies.
Wall M; May DR
Ophthalmology; 1987 Sep; 94(9):1126-33. PubMed ID: 3684230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [The function-structure impairment pattern of optic nerves in primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma].
Wang XM; Sun XH; Dai Y; Kong XM; Chen YH
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Nov; 54(11):811-819. PubMed ID: 30440151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Do pattern deviation values accurately estimate glaucomatous visual field damage in eyes with glaucoma and cataract?
Matsuda A; Hara T; Miyata K; Matsuo H; Murata H; Mayama C; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1240-4. PubMed ID: 25795915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Sensitivity and specificity of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials (SD-tVEP) in discriminating normal from glaucomatous eyes.
Pillai C; Ritch R; Derr P; Gonzalez A; Kopko Cox L; Siegfried J; Liebmann JM; Tello C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 54(4):2847-52. PubMed ID: 23513061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Normal visual field test results following glaucomatous visual field end points in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.
Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Levine RA; Fan J; Cello KE; Kass MA; Gordon MO
Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 Sep; 123(9):1201-6. PubMed ID: 16157799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Amsler grid and visual field on screening for chloroquine retinopathy].
Madalena BV; Oshima A; Serracarbassa PD
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2012; 75(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 22872198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Correlation of macular structure and function in a boy with primary foveomacular retinitis and sequence of changes over 5 years.
Badhani A; Padhi TR; Panda GK; Mukherjee S; Das T; Jalali S
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 28451988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma.
De Moraes CG; Juthani VJ; Liebmann JM; Teng CC; Tello C; Susanna R; Ritch R
Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 129(5):562-8. PubMed ID: 21555607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Early Detection of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Using Pointwise Linear Regression With Binomial Test in the Central 10 Degrees.
Asano S; Murata H; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Asaoka R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 199():140-149. PubMed ID: 30465746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.
Goldberg I; Graham SL; Klistorner AI
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jan; 133(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11755837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
