These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32157161)

  • 1. Human and computer estimations of Predictability of words in written language.
    Bianchi B; Bengolea Monzón G; Ferrer L; Fernández Slezak D; Shalom DE; Kamienkowski JE
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4396. PubMed ID: 32157161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of word embeddings for the biomedical natural language processing.
    Wang Y; Liu S; Afzal N; Rastegar-Mojarad M; Wang L; Shen F; Kingsbury P; Liu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Nov; 87():12-20. PubMed ID: 30217670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Language Models Explain Word Reading Times Better Than Empirical Predictability.
    Hofmann MJ; Remus S; Biemann C; Radach R; Kuchinke L
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():730570. PubMed ID: 35187472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphosyntactic but not lexical corpus-based probabilities can substitute for cloze probabilities in reading experiments.
    Lopukhina A; Lopukhin K; Laurinavichyute A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0246133. PubMed ID: 33508029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Training and intrinsic evaluation of lightweight word embeddings for the clinical domain in Spanish.
    Chiu C; Villena F; Martin K; Núñez F; Besa C; Dunstan J
    Front Artif Intell; 2022; 5():970517. PubMed ID: 36213168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. RastrOS Project: Natural Language Processing contributions to the development of an eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms for Brazilian Portuguese.
    Leal SE; Lukasova K; Carthery-Goulart MT; Aluísio SM
    Lang Resour Eval; 2022; 56(4):1333-1372. PubMed ID: 35990365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing clinical concept extraction with contextual embeddings.
    Si Y; Wang J; Xu H; Roberts K
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Nov; 26(11):1297-1304. PubMed ID: 31265066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limits on lexical prediction during reading.
    Luke SG; Christianson K
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Aug; 88():22-60. PubMed ID: 27376659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word frequency, predictability, and return-sweep saccades: Towards the modeling of eye movements during paragraph reading.
    Parker AJ; Slattery TJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1614-1633. PubMed ID: 31524433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visualization of medical concepts represented using word embeddings: a scoping review.
    Oubenali N; Messaoud S; Filiot A; Lamer A; Andrey P
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Mar; 22(1):83. PubMed ID: 35351120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictability and novelty in literal language comprehension: an ERP study.
    Davenport T; Coulson S
    Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 1418():70-82. PubMed ID: 21925647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lack of contextual-word predictability during reading in patients with mild Alzheimer disease.
    Fernández G; Manes F; Rotstein NP; Colombo O; Mandolesi P; Politi LE; Agamennoni O
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Sep; 62():143-51. PubMed ID: 25080188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading.
    Luke SG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 30088258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Word Embeddings to Study Complications in Neurosurgery.
    Danilov G; Kotik K; Shifrin M; Strunina Y; Pronkina T; Tsukanova T; Ishankulov T; Shults M; Makashova E; Latyshev Y; Sufianov R; Sharipov O; Nazarenko A; Konovalov N; Potapov A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jan; 289():5-8. PubMed ID: 35062078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simplifying drug package leaflets written in Spanish by using word embedding.
    Segura-Bedmar I; Martínez P
    J Biomed Semantics; 2017 Sep; 8(1):45. PubMed ID: 28962645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.
    Albrengues C; Lavigne F; Aguilar C; Castet E; Vitu F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219666. PubMed ID: 31329614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility of General and Specific Word Embeddings for Classifying Translational Stages of Research.
    Major V; Surkis A; Aphinyanaphongs Y
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2018; 2018():1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30815185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cloze probability, predictability ratings, and computational estimates for 205 English sentences, aligned with existing EEG and reading time data.
    de Varda AG; Marelli M; Amenta S
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37880511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual predictability enhances reading performance in patients with schizophrenia.
    Fernández G; Guinjoan S; Sapognikoff M; Orozco D; Agamennoni O
    Psychiatry Res; 2016 Jul; 241():333-9. PubMed ID: 27236087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.