These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32157601)

  • 1. A group-specific prior distribution for effect-size heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Thompson CG; Becker BJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Oct; 52(5):2020-2030. PubMed ID: 32157601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using meta-regression and pseudo data.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; White IR; Jackson D; Spiegelhalter DJ; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(29):5495-5511. PubMed ID: 27577523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis.
    Röver C; Bender R; Dias S; Schmid CH; Schmidli H; Sturtz S; Weber S; Friede T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jul; 12(4):448-474. PubMed ID: 33486828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian estimation in random effects meta-analysis using a non-informative prior.
    Bodnar O; Link A; Arendacká B; Possolo A; Elster C
    Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):378-399. PubMed ID: 27790722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors.
    Al Amer FM; Thompson CG; Lin L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33801771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian approach to sequential meta-analysis.
    Spence GT; Steinsaltz D; Fanshawe TR
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(29):5356-5375. PubMed ID: 27481499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis.
    Turner RM; Jackson D; Wei Y; Thompson SG; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):984-98. PubMed ID: 25475839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rare events meta-analysis using the Bayesian beta-binomial model.
    Jansen K; Holling H
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):853-873. PubMed ID: 37607885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian approach to meta-analysis of plant pathology studies.
    Mila AL; Ngugi HK
    Phytopathology; 2011 Jan; 101(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 20822433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to use prior knowledge and still give new data a chance?
    Weber K; Hemmings R; Koch A
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Jul; 17(4):329-341. PubMed ID: 29667367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating external evidence on between-trial heterogeneity in network meta-analysis.
    Turner RM; Domínguez-Islas CP; Jackson D; Rhodes KM; White IR
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1321-1335. PubMed ID: 30488475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian Power Analysis Procedure Considering Uncertainty in Effect Size Estimates from a Meta-analysis.
    Du H; Wang L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 27485763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian approaches to fixed effects meta-analysis.
    Domínguez Islas C; Rice KM
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jul; 13(4):520-532. PubMed ID: 35485631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis with empirical heterogeneity priors for application in health technology assessment with very few studies.
    Lilienthal J; Sturtz S; Schürmann C; Maiworm M; Röver C; Friede T; Bender R
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Mar; 15(2):275-287. PubMed ID: 38152969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How vague is vague? How informative is informative? Reference analysis for Bayesian meta-analysis.
    Ott M; Plummer M; Roos M
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(20):4505-4521. PubMed ID: 34041768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative approach to frequentist meta-analysis: A demonstration of Bayesian meta-analysis in adolescent development research.
    Thompson CG; Semma B
    J Adolesc; 2020 Jul; 82():86-102. PubMed ID: 32659594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A default prior for regression coefficients.
    van Zwet E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3799-3807. PubMed ID: 30543154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive distributions were developed for the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analyses of continuous outcome data.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; Higgins JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 25304503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interval estimation of the overall treatment effect in random-effects meta-analyses: Recommendations from a simulation study comparing frequentist, Bayesian, and bootstrap methods.
    Weber F; Knapp G; Glass Ä; Kundt G; Ickstadt K
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 33264488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a random effects meta-analysis in the design and analysis of a new clinical trial.
    Jones HE; Ades AE; Sutton AJ; Welton NJ
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4665-4679. PubMed ID: 30187505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.